Donald Hoffman - Does Consciousness Cause the Cosmos?
L7:
If all consciousness ceased to exist, what would matter be? Well, it wouldn't matter much.
Suresh Madusanka:
Think about the start of the consciousness first. The double slit experiment shows us how the previous state of the quantum objects (particles) changed once we measure it. Quantum objects pass the double slit like waves making a wave pattern on the screen, but when we measure it near the screen it goes back in time and comes back to hit the screen like particles to show only two slits on the screen. So it sounds like that our interaction with the quantum objects can change the history of the quantum objects. Same like that, maybe if some natural events caused to form a consciousness to detect an interaction then it can change the history of those natural events which caused to form a consciousness to detect an interaction too. So, maybe that was the first ignorance (Pali: avijjā ) of a consciousness which lost the previous natural events (records) which caused to form a consciousness. And it seems that each and every consciousness is an illusion which sounds like its own creator on its own ignorance. However, the consciousness is just a part of some natural events, but the consciousness is almost fundamental too:
According to Buddhist quantum physics the origin of the smallest unit of matter, called a “suddhāṭṭhaka.” (sometimes written as suddhāshtaka). These eight never arise in isolation and thus are called “avinibbhoga rupa.” They always rise together; all eight are there in any suddhāṭṭhaka. The relative “amounts” of each component can vary, and thus some suddhāṭṭhaka can be dominated by one element, for example. Even then, all eight are present to some extent. From those, the most fundamental four units are called 'Satara mahā bhūta'.
One’s character (gati) determines one’s future births. The ability to figure that out is called the “nāmarūpa pariccēda ñāna“ (one understands how the mind is related to matter, i.e., how viññāna acts as the critical link between mind and matter.).
(*Read more about "The Origin of Matter – Suddhāṭṭhaka" at Pure Dhamma website.)
We can try to use a new type of mathematics to discover the truth. I guess the mind is based on the first 4 elementary particles in the Universe called 'Maha Bhūta Gati (Gati Bhūta)' ('Character of matter ghosts/particles') which cause to form another 4 matter elementary particles in the Universe called 'Mahā Bhūta'. And our mind doesn't have a start, because the Universe started to form from the first 4 elementary particles ('Gati Bhūta') which was the first cause to form the mind with the help of other elementary particles. The first relationship of the mind is with the immaterial particles ('Gati Bhūta'), and that immaterial particles caused to make the matter particles ('Mahā Bhūta'), so it sounds like the mind ('Gati Bhūta') made the matter. And mathematically I think the matter particles are under or outside the first 4 elementary particles like this: immaterial particles (matter particles) OR matter particles (immaterial particles). I guess the particles which are inside the bracket caused to form the particles which are outside the bracket. Eg: According to this mathematical formula: (a+b)^2=a^2+2ab+b^2
Matter + Antimatter = (+0-0)^6 + (-0+0)^6
(+0-0)^6 = (+1-(-1))^3 x (+0.0-0.0)^3
(+1-(-1))^3 =
(+1)3 - ((+1)3 x (-1) - ((-1)2 x (+1)2)) + (-1)2 x (+1) - ((+1)2 x (-1) - ((+1)2 x (-1)2 - ((-1)3 x (+1))) + (-1)3)
There are two sets:
Outside set:
(+1)3 - ((+1)3 x (-1) - ((-1)2 x (+1)2)) + (-1)2 x (+1)
Inside set:
- ((+1)2 x (-1) - ((+1)2 x (-1)2 - ((-1)3 x (+1))) + (-1)3)
I guess, only the life in Brahma worlds and the life in Heavenly worlds could exist if the Universe were not able to form the life on earth (Human world). According to Buddhism our mind use 4 elementary ghosts (active invisible particles) called Character ('gati') ghosts (Character of 4 matter particles) to make matter too, and according to Buddhism almost all the matter particles (mahā bhūta) in the universe came from an interaction of 'Gati Bhūta' ('Character of matter ghosts'/ 'immaterial particles') and the mind which works together. That is where mental energy (immaterial) is converted to matter at the very fundamental stage. So, maybe the Brahma life could form easier than other life forms from a small group of the elementary particles.
According to Quantum Physics almost all the elemantary particles don't have a single Quantum state until we interact with it to measure it, so the elementary particles are a representation of many dimensions at once, and I think it is not a wave, but it interacts like a wave too. The universe is based on dimensional interactions, and the dimensions don't have a position and a speed because of the singularity of the universe. So the physical meaning of the elemantary particles is a representation of the singularity of the early universe too. We can use the duality of the 6 directions of the universe to find the dimensions of the Universe.
The four mahā bhūta ('Matter') are with four basic “gati”. It says, “gati (character) attracts a similar gati”. Thus “gati” leads to “bhūta,” the first phase of rupa that can be seen (only by Buddha). That is the suddhāṭṭhaka stage.
When enormous numbers of these suddhāṭṭhaka fuse, they get to a more condensed state of “mahā bhūta.” The subtle bodies of Brahmā and some gandhabbā are made of mahā bhūta.
Only when vast amounts of these mahā bhūta fuse together to become even more condensed, that we can see them. At this highly condensed state, the matter is called “dhātu.” Bodies of devas are made of finer dhātu. That is why we cannot see devas, but Brahmā can see them.
Thus our bodies are made of more dense dhātu that we can see. That is why solid objects are called “Pathavi dhātu“; suddhāṭṭhaka in such solid objects have predominantly Pathavi.
According to the Buddhism there are 16 hells (16 Hells = 8 Cold Hells + 8 Hot Hells). Above the hell levels there are 10 levels. 4 levels for Animals , Ghosts, Asura, Humans. And there are 5 levels (good heavens), and the last level (6th heaven is a highly enjoying Kaama/Mara heaven) (Dark Matter sounds like heavens). But the next 20 levels (20 brahma levels) are almost neutral (without genders). The first 10 brahma levels enjoy bliss (with body) but the next 10 brahma levels are neutral (with mind).
We can't use Kilogram, Litre, Time, Distance to explain Quantum Physics, Most units are not fundamental, and quantum physics should be based on ratios, dimensions, virtual shapes etc. There is a difference between the Quantum Reality and the Physical Reality. If you want to explain Quantum Physics, then you have to use the Mathematics of the Universe. I already have enough mathematical explanations to understand quantum physics. If you can't understand the real mathematics of the Universe, then you can't understand science too. Maybe there are a lot of people who can't understand the foundations of mathematics. But without mathematics you can't talk about science.
- W S M
------------------------------------------------------------------
Bhante Samahita: Early Buddhism, Quantum Physics, and Relativity
------------------------------------------------------------------
👻 Metaphysics of Ghosts 👻
Suresh Madusanka:
Very interesting. And Thank you so much for your effort. I think definitely there is a very deep level of quantum physics for Ghosts, Gods, Brahma beings etc. According to Quantum Physics our Atoms have two main elementary particles called Up Quark and Down Quark. I think the Mass is a main thing which separate the worlds of living beings. The Mass of a Down Quark: 4.7+0.5; −0.3 MeV/c^2 (The bare mass of the down quark is not well determined, but probably lies between 4.5 and 5.3 MeV/c^2 or Lattice QCD value : 4.79±0.16 MeV/c^2. It Decays into: Stable or Up quark + Electron + Electron antineutrino.). If the standard Down Quark is just a combination of smaller down quarks, and if there is a Down Quark with a Mass around 0.467 MeV/c^2 (Around 10 times smaller than the standard Down Quark (4.7/10)), and if there is a Down Quark with a Mass around 0.093463 MeV/c^2 (Around 50 times smaller than the standard Down Quark (4.7/50)), then maybe those smaller Quarks can make a new type of Atoms which don't require to interact with our Atoms and our elementary particles, and then it can be very difficult for us to discover those smaller Quarks and other smaller elementary particles. - Suresh
------------------------------------------------------------------
Dependent Origination Workshop I (part 1) | Ajahn Brahmali and Venerable Sunyo | 31 October 2020
Suresh Madusanka:
Sadhu Sadhu Sadhu 🙏🙏🙏 I specially thank Ven. Ajahn Brahmali for making the dhamma simple and clear. However, I have heard that the Buddha didn't want to teach abhidhamma to humans, so that is why the Buddha chose heaven to teach abhidhamma to heavenly beings, but Ven (Maha Arhat/Enlightened). Sariputta also could listen to that teaching, and he summarized it in order to teach it to humans by himself. So the language and the teaching style of the Ven. Sariputta can make a difference between abhidhamma and the other teachings of the Buddha. And the buddha didn't teach abhidhamma to humans directly. However, I guess the abhidhamma is not a big requirement to be a stream-enterer, but sometimes the abhidhamma sounds like quantum physics to me.
Yong Jie An:
The Buddha did not teach abhidhamma! The Buddha only taught the Dhamma to all including to minks, humans and devas (he taught his mother the Dhamma in the heavens as a form of gratitude)
Suresh Madusanka:
@Yong Jie An, The Buddha taught Damma to Humans and Davas, but there is a deep teaching called Abhidhamma in Theravada Buddhism which teaches about the mechanism of the mind etc. I don't know whether Mahayana Buddhism teach Abhidhamma or not. I don't know much about Abhidhamma, but I found this information from WikiPedia (Abhidhamma_Piṭaka):
"Tradition holds that the Buddha thought out the Abhidhamma immediately after his enlightenment then taught it to the gods some years later. Later, the Buddha repeated it to Sariputta who then transmitted it to his disciples. This tradition is evident in the Parivara, a late text from the Vinaya Pitaka, which mentions in a concluding verse of praise to the Buddha that this best of creatures, the lion, taught the three pitakas."
------------------------------------------------------------------
The Strange Science of Neutrinos
Suresh Madusanka:
I think the Universe made 16 elementary particles with the nature of matter and another 16 elementary particles against it with the nature of antimatter which caused to annihilate each other, but when the dimensional formations used dimensions to form particles, mass, charge and spin between shared dimensions with dimensional gaps it caused a tiny unbalance in the Ratio of the Matter quarks and Antimatter quarks in the early Universe (3000000001:3000000000) which caused to survive a very small portion of elementary particles (1 from 3000000001).
Where's all the antimatter?
------------------------------------------------------------------
Can we find a theory of everything?
Suresh Madusanka:
Very interesting. Thank you so much for sharing your great knowledge.
Suresh Madusanka:
There are mathematical structures and mathematical ratios between elementary particles:
Finding a mathematical beauty between the elementary particles in the standard model of particle physics:
The Mass of a Up Quark = 2.2 MeV/c^2
The Mass of a Charm Quark = 1280 MeV/c^2
The Mass of a Top Quark = 173100 MeV/c^2
The Mass of a Electron = 0.511 MeV/c^2
The Mass of a Muon = 105.66 MeV/c^2
The Mass of a Tau = 1776.8 MeV/c^2
2.2 / 0.511 = 4.305283757338552 ---- (A)
1280 / 105.66 = 12.11432897974636 ---- (B)
173100 / 1776.8 = 97.42233228275552 ---- (C)
From (B) and (C);
97.42233228275552 / 12.11432897974636 = 8.041909085153082 or around 8 ---- (D)
Bottom Quark 4180 MeV/C^2
/ Strange Quark 96 MeV/C^2
= 43.5 or around 40 ---- (E)
Strange Quark 96 MeV/C^2
/ Down Quark 4.7 MeV/C^2
= 20.4 or around 20 ---- (F)
From (E) and (F);
Main Pattern Factor = 40/20 = 2 ---- (G)
From (D) and (G);
8/2 = 4 ---- (H)
From (B) and (H);
12.11432897974636 / 4 = 3.02858224493659 (But (A) = 4.305283757338552)
Finding a mathematical beauty:
173100 / 4180 = 41.41148325358852
1280 / 96 = 13.33333333333333
2.2 / 4.7 = 0.4680851063829787
41.41148325358852 / 13.33333333333333 = 3.105861244019139
-------------------------------------------------------
Finding a mathematical beauty:
173100 / 1280 = 135.234375
Pattern Factor = 2
135.234375 / 2 = 67.6171875
1280 / 67.6171875 = 18.93009820912767
18.93009820912767 / 4.7 = 4.027680470027164
1280 / 105.66 = 12.11432897974636
173100 / 1776.8 = 97.42233228275552
97.42233228275552 / 41.41148325358852 = 2.352543899144529 or around 2.35 or 4.7/2
A mathematical beauty:
2.352543899144529 x 2 = 4.705087798289058 (around the mass of a down quark)
According to the Pattern of the Down, Strange and Bottom Quarks:
4.7/10 = 0.47 OR around 0.467 MeV/c^2
0.47/5 = 0.094 OR around 0.093463217 MeV/c^2
If the Down Quark is at the center;
The Mass of a quark in the smaller 3rd quarks group = 4.7 / 50 = 0.094
4.705087798289058 / 50 = 0.0941017559657812 or around 0.093463217 MeV/c^2
The number of standard elementary particles groups (columns) = 3
The most obvious impact between the last particles group with the first particles group of the standard model:
The impact = (The Up quark position / 8) for (The Tau position / 2)
OR
The impact = (The Tau position / 2) for (The Up quark position / 8)
Start of the Pattern Factor = 2
Growth of the Pattern Factor = 2 x 2 x 2 = 8
18.93009820912767 / 8 = 2.366262276140959
(2 + 2.366262276140959)/2 = 2.18313113807048 (around the mass of a up quark)
My calculations show a mathematical beauty between some elementary particles in the Standard Model which can help to find the missing links of the other particles.
- W. Suresh Madusanka
-------------------------------------------------------
Suresh Madusanka:
Finding a mathematical beauty to calculate the Masses of nearest main small elementary particles:
According to the ratios of the Masses there are many Pattern Factors. Eg: The Pattern Factors of Electron, Muon and Tau should be equal to 3. And there are Pattern Factors for Up, Charm and Top quarks around 4 : 8 or 2 : 4 : 8, and it shows an impact to the Electron too.
If we remove the impact to the Tau then the virtual mass of the Tau = 1776.8 x 2 = 3553.6 MeV/c^2
The virtual mass of the Tau 3553.6 MeV/c^2 / The mass of the Muon 105.66 MeV/c^2 = 33.63240583002082
The Pattern Factor of Leptons = 3
The mass of the Muon 105.66 MeV/c^2 / The virtual mass of the Electron = 33.63240583002082 x 3
The virtual mass of the Electron = 105.66 / 100.8972174900625 = 1.047204299864926 MeV/c^2
The virtual mass of the Electron 1.047204299864926 MeV/c^2 / 2 = 0.5236021499324629is or around the standard mass of the Electron = 0.511 MeV/c^2
So the most possible impacts (ratio);
(The Up quark position / 8) : (The Electron position / 2) : (The Tau position / 2)
Prediction 1:
The virtual mass of the Electron 1.047204299864926 MeV/c^2 / A small Electron = 100.8972174900625 x 3
A small Electron = 1.047204299864926 / 302.6916524701875 = 0.0034596404998914 MeV/c^2
OR A small Electron = 0.511 x 2 / 302.6916524701875 = 0.0033763732552904 MeV/c^2
The most possible Mass of a small Electron = 0.0034 MeV/c^2
Prediction 2:
--------------------
The 1st possibility:
Main Pattern Factor = 2
135.234375 / 2 = 67.6171875
67.6171875 / 2 = 33.80859375
A small Up Quark = 2.2 / 33.80859375 = 0.0650722125938764 MeV/c^2
But,
A small Up Quark / A small Electron = 0.0650722125938764 / 0.0034 = 19.13888605702246
And,
A small Up Quark / A small Electron should be equal to around 3.02858224493659 / 4 = 0.7571455612341475
--------------------
The 2nd possibility:
2.2 / 135.234375 = 0.0162680531484691 MeV/c^2
But,
A small Up Quark / A small Electron = 0.0162680531484691 / 0.0034 = 4.784721514255616
And,
A small Up Quark / A small Electron should be equal to around 0.7571455612341475
--------------------
The 3rd possibility:
1280 / 2.2 = 581.8181818181818
581.8181818181818 / 135.234375 = 4.302295047529016 or around 4
A possible Pattern Factor = 4
A possible Pattern = 4 x 135.234375 x 4 (OR 581.8181818181818 x 4)
The virtual mass of the Up Quark = 18.93009820912767 MeV/c^2
A small Up Quark = 18.93009820912767 / (4 x 135.234375 x 4) = 0.0087487455616997 MeV/c^2
OR A small Up Quark = 2.2 x 8 / 2163.75 = 0.0081340265742345 MeV/c^2
(0.0087487455616997 + 0.0081340265742345) / 2 = 0.0084413860679671
A possible mass of a small Up Quark = 0.008441 MeV/c^2 (OR 0.00874 OR 0.00813 MeV/c^2)
But,
A small Up Quark / A small Electron = 0.00844 / 0.0034 = 2.482352941176471
And,
A small Up Quark / A small Electron should be equal to around 0.7571455612341475
--------------------
The 4th possibility:
2.2 / 581.8181818181818 = 0.00378125 MeV/c^2
But,
A small Up Quark / A small Electron = 0.00378125 / 0.0034 = 1.112132352941177
And,
A small Up Quark / A small Electron should be equal to around 0.7571455612341475
--------------------
The 5th possibility:
2.2 / ((135.234375 x 4) x 3 / 2) = 2.2 / 811.40625 = 0.0027113421914115 MeV/c^2
But,
A small Up Quark / A small Electron = 0.0027113421914115 / 0.0034 = 0.7974535857092647
And,
A small Up Quark / A small Electron should be equal to around 0.7571455612341475
--------------------
The 6th possibility:
A small Up Quark / A small Electron should be equal to around 0.7571455612341475
So the required mass of a small Up Quark = 0.00844 x (0.7571455612341475 / 2.482352941176471) = 0.00844 x 0.3050112450469314 MeV/c^2
So the most possible Mass of a small Up Quark = 0.0025742949081961 MeV/c^2 OR around 0.00257 MeV/c^2
A small Up Quark / A small Electron = 0.0025742949081961 / 0.0034 = 0.7571455612341471
--------------------
Conclusion:
It seems that there are many types of small Up Quarks (Upper Quarks).
The most possible main Mass of a small Up Quark should be around 0.00257 MeV/c^2 OR 0.00271 MeV/c^2 OR 0.00844 MeV/c^2
---------------------------------------------------------
Finding a mathematical beauty:
41.41148325358852 / 13.33333333333333 = 3.105861244019139 (The Pattern Factor = around 3)
13.33333333333333 / 3 = 4.444444444444443 (But; Up Quark 2.2 / Down Quark 4.7 = 0.4680851063829787)
--------------------------------------
If a small Up Quark = 0.00257 MeV/c^2;
A small Up Quark 0.00257 MeV/c^2 / A small Down Quark 0.467 MeV/c^2 = 0.0055032119914347
-------------------
The 1st Possibility:
0.4680851063829787 / 3 = 0.1560283687943262
0.1560283687943262 / 0.0055032119914347 = 28.35223666418296
A possible mass of a small Down Quark = 0.467 MeV/c^2 / 28.35223666418296 = 0.01647 MeV/c^2
-------------------
The 2nd Possibility:
4.444444444444443 / 3 = 1.481481481481481
1.481481481481481 / 0.0055032119914347 = 269.2030551952725
A possible mass of a small Down Quark = 0.467 MeV/c^2 / 269.2030551952725 = 0.00173 MeV/c^2
-------------------
The 3rd Possibility:
The virtual Up Quark 18.93009820912767 / Down Quark 4.7 = 4.027680470027164
4.027680470027164 / 3 = 1.342560156675721
1.342560156675721 / 0.0055032119914347 = 243.9593747733699
A possible mass of a small Down Quark = 0.467 MeV/c^2 / 243.9593747733699 = 0.00191 MeV/c^2
--------------------------------------
If a small Up Quark = 0.00844 MeV/c^2;
A small Up Quark 0.00844 MeV/c^2 / A small Down Quark 0.467 MeV/c^2 = 0.0180728051391863
-------------------
The 1st Possibility:
0.4680851063829787 / 3 = 0.1560283687943262
0.1560283687943262 / 0.0180728051391863 = 8.633323249638665
A possible mass of a small Down Quark = 0.467 MeV/c^2 / 8.633323249638665 = 0.05409 MeV/c^2
-------------------
The 2nd Possibility:
4.444444444444443 / 3 = 1.481481481481481
1.481481481481481 / 0.0180728051391863 = 81.97296822889235
A possible mass of a small Down Quark = 0.467 MeV/c^2 / 81.97296822889235 = 0.005697 MeV/c^2
-------------------
The 3rd Possibility:
The virtual Up Quark 18.93009820912767 / Down Quark 4.7 = 4.027680470027164
4.027680470027164 / 3 = 1.342560156675721
1.342560156675721 / 0.0180728051391863 = 74.28620772127507
A possible mass of a small Down Quark = 0.467 MeV/c^2 / 74.28620772127507 = 0.006286 MeV/c^2
-----------------------------------------------------------
Finding a mathematical beauty:
Down Quark 4.7 / The virtual mass of the Electron 1.047204299864926 = 4.488140471354282 or around 4
Strange Quark 96 / Muon 105.66 = 0.9085746734809767 or around 1
Bottom Quark 4180 / Muon 1776.8 = 2.352543899144529 or around 2
The above Pattern Factors ratio = 4 : 1 : 2
The most possible Pattern Factors = 0.5 : 4 : 1 : 2 OR 2 : 4 : 1 : 2 OR 3 : 4 : 1 : 2
The 1st Possibility:
A possible mass of a small Down Quark 0.00173 / A small Electron 0.0034 = 0.5088235294117647 or around 0.5
The Pattern Factor of the 0.00173 small Down Quark matches the above most possible Pattern Factor 0.5 which came from this pattern factors 0.5 : 4 : 1 : 2.
The 2nd Possibility:
A possible mass of a small Down Quark 0.006286 / A small Electron 0.0034 = 1.848823529411765 or around 2
The Pattern Factor of the 0.006286 small Down Quark matches the above most possible Pattern Factor 2 which came from this pattern factors 2 : 4 : 1 : 2.
Final Prediction:
According to the impacts of the most Pattern Factors the most possible previous layer of the Up Quark, Down Quark and Electron:
The most possible Mass of a nearest main small Up Quark (Upper Quark) = 0.00257 MeV/c^2 (OR maximum around 0.008441 MeV/c^2)
The most possible Mass of a nearest main small Down Quark (Lower Quark) = 0.00173 MeV/c^2 (OR maximum around 0.006286 MeV/c^2)
The most possible Mass of a nearest main small Electron (Mini Electron) = 0.0034 MeV/c^2
The 27km long LHC could discover the 4.7 MeV/c^2 particle, and maybe a 100km long LHC or a maximum a 500km long LHC can discover can discover a 0.00257 MeV/c^2 Upper Quark, 0.00173 MeV/c^2 Lower Quark and a 0.0034 MeV/c^2 Mini Electron particles etc.
- W. Suresh Madusanka
Suresh Madusanka:
Combination of the duality of the 6 directions and the 6 distances of the first start of the Universe: (+0-0)^6 + (-0+0)^6 = MATTER + ANTIMATTER
(+0-0)^6
=
i: (+1-(-1))^3
X
ii: (+0.0-0.0)^3
= ( This should be the Pure Eight (Pali: Suddhātthaka) in Buddhism:
Maybe there is a fundamental cause for the stable existence of the Heat, Solid, Liquid and Gas.
Heat...: + (+1)^3
Solid..: - ((+1)^3 x (-1)
Liquid.: - ((-1)^2 x (+1)^2))
Gas....: + (-1)^2 x (+1)
- (
+ (+1)^2 x (-1)
- ((+1)^2 x (-1)^2
- ((-1)^3 x (+1)))
+ (-1)^3)
)) x
ii: (+0.0-0.0)^3
= ( This should be the 12 elementary particles (of matter) of Standard Model (in particle physics):
01. electron neutrino:
+ (+(1))(+1)^3
02. electron:
- ((+(1))(+1)^3 x (-1)
03. down quark:
- ((+(1))(-1)^2 x (+1)^2))
04. up quark:
+ (+(1))(-1)^2 x (+1)
- (
{ Standard Forces
} AND/OR
{
05. charm quark:
+ (+(1))(+1)^2 x (-1)
06. strange quark:
- (+(1))((+1)^2 x (-1)^2
07. muon:
- (+(1))((-1)^3 x (+1)))
08. muon neutrino:
+ (+(1))(-1)^3
}
)
- (
09. tau neutrino:
+ (-(1))(+1)^3
10. tau:
- ((-(1))(+1)^3 x (-1)
11. bottom quark:
- ((-(1))(-1)^2 x (+1)^2))
12. top quark:
+ (-(1))(-1)^2 x (+1)
- ( Mini Forces:
13. Mini Z^0 boson:
+ (-(1))(+1)^2 x (-1)
14. Mini W^+ boson:
- (-(1))((+1)^2 x (-1)^2
15. Mini gluon:
- (-(1))((-1)^3 x (+1)))
16. Mini photon:
+ (-(1))(-1)^3))
))) x
This should be the Higgs boson field in Standard Model (in particle physics):
17: (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)
OR
= ( This should be the position and structure of the 12 standard elementary particles and the 4 forces of the Standard Model (in particle physics):
01. electron neutrino (Mass Ratio Array: (i.) 0.0022 | (ii.) 0.000468 | (iii.) 0.000052631 | (iv.) 0.000011198):
+ (+(1))(+1)^3
02. electron (Mass Ratio Array: (i.) 0.511 | (ii.) 0.1087 | (iii.) 0.01222489 | (iv.) 0.00260104):
- ((+(1))(+1)^3 x (-1)
03. down quark (Mass Ratio Array: (i.) 4.7 | (ii.) 1 | (iii.) 0.112440192 | (iv.) 0.023923445):
- ((+(1))(-1)^2 x (+1)^2))
04. up quark (Mass Ratio Array: (i.) 2.2 | (ii.) 0.468 | (iii.) 0.05263159 | (iv.) 0.01119821):
+ (+(1))(-1)^2 x (+1)
- (
{ Forces:
05. Z^0 boson (Mass Ratio Array: (i.) 91190 | (ii.) 19402.1 | (iii.) 2181.5789475 | (iv.) 464.1657335):
+ (+(1))(+1)^2 x (-1)
06. W^+ boson (Mass Ratio Array: (i.) 80390 | (ii.) 17104.25 | (iii.) 1923.205742 | (iv.) 409.192711):
- (+(1))((+1)^2 x (-1)^2
07. gluon:
- (+(1))((-1)^3 x (+1)))
08. photon:
+ (+(1))(-1)^3
} AND/OR
{
05. charm quark (Mass Ratio Array: (i.) 1280 | (ii.) 272.34 | (iii.) 30.62201 | (iv.) 6.5153212):
+ (+(1))(+1)^2 x (-1)
06. strange quark (Mass Ratio Array: (i.) 96 | (ii.) 20.4 | (iii.) 2.2966508 | (iv.) 0.4886491):
- (+(1))((+1)^2 x (-1)^2
07. muon (Mass Ratio Array: (i.) 105.66 | (ii.) 22.48 | (iii.) 2.527754 | (iv.) 0.53782):
- (+(1))((-1)^3 x (+1)))
08. muon neutrino (Mass Ratio Array: (i.) 0.17 | (ii.) 0.036 | (iii.) 0.004067004 | (iv.) 0.00086532):
+ (+(1))(-1)^3
}
)
- (
{
09. mini neutrino:
+ (-(1))(+1)^3
10. mini electron:
- ((-(1))(+1)^3 x (-1)
11. lower quark:
- ((-(1))(-1)^2 x (+1)^2))
12. upper quark:
+ (-(1))(-1)^2 x (+1)
} AND/OR
{
09. tau neutrino (Mass Ratio Array: (i.) 18.2 | (ii.) 3.87 | (iii.) 0.435408 | (iv.) 0.09264):
+ (-(1))(+1)^3
10. tau (Mass Ratio Array: (i.) 1776.8 | (ii.) 378 | (iii.) 42.50727 | (iv.) 9.0441):
- ((-(1))(+1)^3 x (-1)
11. bottom quark (Mass Ratio Array: (i.) 4180 | (ii.) 889.36 | (iii.) 100 | (iv.) 21.276596):
- ((-(1))(-1)^2 x (+1)^2))
12. top quark (Mass Ratio Array: (i.) 173100 | (ii.) 36829.787 | (iii.) 4141.148333 | (iv.) 881.09539):
+ (-(1))(-1)^2 x (+1)
}
- (
{ Mini Forces (including Quantum Gravity):
13. Mini Z^0 boson:
+ (-(1))(+1)^2 x (-1)
14. Mini W^+ boson:
- (-(1))((+1)^2 x (-1)^2
15. Mini gluon:
- (-(1))((-1)^3 x (+1)))
16. Mini photon:
+ (-(1))(-1)^3))
} AND
{
13. mini charm quark:
+ (-(1))(+1)^2 x (-1)
14. mini strange quark:
- (-(1))((+1)^2 x (-1)^2
15. mini muon:
- (-(1))((-1)^3 x (+1)))
16. mini muon neutrino:
+ (-(1))(-1)^3))
}
))) x
17: (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)
= nearly:
( Maybe there are 6 layers of elementary particles with spin (0.5 or 1/2), and Charge 2/3 and -1/3:
((+0.5......-(-0.5......)) + (+0.5......-(-0.5......)) + (+0.5......-(-0.5......))) x
(2,/3 / (1........x(7/7)) x 1......x(5/5) x 1_..../(3/3) / (1...... x 1_../(1/1))
- 1..../3 x (1....../(5/5) x (NEUTRAL)/5 X5) x 1_..../(3/3) / (1.....x(5/5) x (NEUTRAL) x 1_../(1/1))) x 0.00000
According to my mathematical calculations, the unstable 6th dimension caused to make 1/2 Spin, 2/3 and -1/3 Charge, 6 layers of elementary particles, Combinations of layers etc.
- W. Suresh Madusanka
-------------------------------------------
Suresh Madusanka:
There is space for 6 dimensions because of the 6 directons of the Universe. I have explained how (+1-(-1))3 dimensions combined and make 8 dimensional formations including 4 dimensional forms with 3 dimensions and 4 dimensional forms with 4 dimensions. And then a 5th dimension (+1-(-1)) from this (+0.0-0.0)3 with a strange field (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) which caused to form the 6 quarks, 6 leptons, 4 forces and a strange Higgs boson of the standard model in particle physics.
(+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) = (+1-(-1))3 x (+0.0-0.0)3
(+0.0-0.0)3 = (+(1)-(-(1))) x (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)
Most Possible or Probable Outputs of (+0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) :
(+0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) = (+0.0-0.0) x (0) x (0) x (+0.0-0.0) ----(A)
(+0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) = (+0.000/(0) - 0.000/(0)) x (+0.0x(0)-0.0x(0)) ----(B)
From the (A):
(+0.000 - 0.000) x 1_../(1/1) = (+0.0-0.0) x (0) x (0) x 1..x(1/1) ----(P)
((+0.000 - 0.000) x 1_../(1/1))/ ((0) x 1..x(1/1)) = (+0.0-0.0) x (0) ----(C)
From the (B) and (C):
(+0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) = (+0.000/(0) - 0.000/(0)) x ((+0.000 - 0.000) x 1_../(1/1))/ ((0) x 1..x(1/1))
1_..../(3/3) x (+0.0-0.0) = (+0.000/(0) - 0.000/(0)) x (1....x(3/3) x 1_../(1/1))/ ((0) x 1..x(1/1)) ----(Q)
(+0.000/(0) - 0.000/(0)) = 1_..../(3/3) x 1..x(1/1) x (+0.0-0.0) x (0) / (1....x(3/3) x 1_../(1/1)) ----(D)
From the (B) and (D):
(+0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) = 1_..../(3/3) x 1..x(1/1) x (+0.0-0.0) x (0) / (1....x(3/3) x 1_../(1/1)) x (+0.0x(0)-0.0x(0))
(+0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) = (+0.00-0.00) x (+0.00-0.00) x 1_..../(3/3) x 1..x(1/1) / (1....x(3/3) x 1_../(1/1))
Using this (a+b)^2=a^2+2ab+b^2 mathematical formula to get the Most Possible or Probable outputs of this result:
(+0.00-0.00) x (+0.00-0.00) x 1_..../(3/3) x 1..x(1/1) / (1....x(3/3) x 1_../(1/1))
= (0.00^2 - (1...... x 1......) x 0.00 x 0.00 + 0.00^2) x 1_..../(3/3) x 1....x(3/3) / (1......x(5/5) x 1_../(1/1))
= (0.00000/(1......x(5/5)) - (1......) x (NEUTRAL) x 0.00000 /5 X5) + 0.00000/(1......x(5/5))) x 1_..../(3/3) x 1....x(3/3) / ((NEUTRAL) x 1_../(1/1))
= ((0.00000/(1......x(5/5)) + 0.00000/(1......x(5/5))) x 1....x(3/3) - (1......) x 0.00000 x (NEUTRAL)/5 X5 x 1....x(3/3)) x 1_..../(3/3) / ((NEUTRAL) x 1_../(1/1))
Starting to use the 6th dimension. But it makes many small forms of it, because it is unable to make a large main dimension.
= ((0.00000/(1......x(5/5)) + 0.00000/(1......x(5/5))) x 1....x(3/3) - (+0.5......-(-0.5......)) x 1....x(3/3) x 0.00000 x (NEUTRAL)/5 X5) x 1_..../(3/3) / ((NEUTRAL) x 1_../(1/1))
= (((0.00000/(1......x(5/5)) + 0.00000/(1......x(5/5))) x 1....x(3/3)) - ((+0.5......-(-0.5......)) x 1....x(3/3) x 0.00000 x (NEUTRAL)/5 X5)) x 1_..../(3/3) / ((NEUTRAL) x 1_../(1/1))
= (0.00000/(1........x(7/7)) x 2, x 3 /3 x (+0.5......-(-0.5......)) - (+0.5......-(-0.5......)) x 1....x(3/3) x 0.00000 x (NEUTRAL)/5 X5) x 1_..../(3/3) / ((NEUTRAL) x 1_../(1/1))
= (+0.5......-(-0.5......)) x (0.00000/(1........x(7/7)) x 2, x 3 /3 - 1....x(3/3) x 0.00000 x (NEUTRAL)/5 X5) x 1_..../(3/3) / ((NEUTRAL) x 1_../(1/1))
= (+0.5......-(-0.5......)) x (2, x 3 /3 /(1........x(7/7)) - 1....x(3/3) x (NEUTRAL)/5 X5) x 0.00000 x 1_..../(3/3) / ((NEUTRAL) x 1_../(1/1))
= (+0.5......-(-0.5......)) x 3 x (2,/3 / (1........x(7/7)) - 1..../3 x (NEUTRAL)/5 X5) x 0.00000 x 1_..../(3/3) / ((NEUTRAL) x 1_../(1/1))
= ((+0.5......-(-0.5......)) + (+0.5......-(-0.5......)) + (+0.5......-(-0.5......))) x (2,/3 / (1........x(7/7)) x 1......x(5/5) - 1..../3 x 1....../(5/5) x (NEUTRAL)/5 X5) x 0.00000 x 1_..../(3/3) / (1......x(5/5) x (NEUTRAL) x 1_../(1/1))
= ((+0.5......-(-0.5......)) + (+0.5......-(-0.5......)) + (+0.5......-(-0.5......))) x (2,/3 / (1........x(7/7)) x 1......x(5/5) x 1_..../(3/3) / (1...... x 1_../(1/1)) - 1..../3 x (1....../(5/5) x (NEUTRAL)/5 X5) x 1_..../(3/3) / (1.....x(5/5) x (NEUTRAL) x 1_../(1/1))) x 0.00000
So, the final output of this (+0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) is nearly: ((+0.5......-(-0.5......)) + (+0.5......-(-0.5......)) + (+0.5......-(-0.5......))) x (2,/3 / (1........x(7/7)) x 1......x(5/5) x 1_..../(3/3) / (1...... x 1_../(1/1)) - 1..../3 x (1....../(5/5) x (NEUTRAL)/5 X5) x 1_..../(3/3) / (1.....x(5/5) x (NEUTRAL) x 1_../(1/1))) x 0.00000
According to the Standard Model of Particle Physics,
the Spin of most elementary particles = 1/2 (or 0.5)
the Charge of some Quarks = 2/3
the Charge of other Quarks = -1/3
the Charge of electrons = -1
According to my mathematical calculations the 6th +1-1 dimension is unstable, because already there are +0.5-0.5 half dimension with larger +2/3 dimension against the -1/3 dimension, so that is why those dimensions behave like Spin and Charge of elementary particles.
I think my mathematical calculations clearly show a similarity to the elementary particles of the Standard Model in Particle Physics.
- W. Suresh Madusanka
(That was the second part of My Theory Of Everything.)
------------------------------------------------------------
The Entanglement Of Mathematical Structures Of The Elementary Particles Theory by Suresh
-----------------------------------------------
Is supersymmetry real?
-----------------------------------------------
The Future of Consciousness in the Universe ~ Documentary 2020
-----------------------------------------------
Can Future Colliders Break the Standard Model?
Will A New Neutrino Change The Standard Model?
Beyond the Higgs: What's Next for the LHC? - with Harry Cliff
How do you detect a neutrino?
-----------------------------------------------
Dependent Origination Workshop || (part 5) | Ajahn Brahmali and Venerable Sunyo | 7 November 2020
Suresh Madusanka:
Sadhu Sadhu Sadhu.. Thanks for the profound explanations. I like to share few details with comments readers: The Karma is not the only thing which cause problems to us. But also heredity, environment, nature and nurture cause problems. According to Buddhism, there are five orders or processes (niyama) which operate in the physical and mental realms.
They are:
Utu Niyama - physical inorganic order, e.g. seasonal phenomena of winds and rains. The unerring order of seasons, characteristic seasonal changes and events, causes of winds and rains, nature of heat, etc., all belong to this group.
Bija Niyama - order of germs and seeds (physical organic order), e.g. rice produced from rice-seed, sugary taste from sugar-cane or honey, peculiar characteristics of certain fruits, etc. The scientific theory of cells and genes and the physical similarity of twins may be ascribed to this order.
Karma Niyama - order of act and result, e.g., desirable and undesirable acts produce corresponding good and bad results. As surely as water seeks its own level so does Karma, given opportunity, produce its inevitable result, not in the form of a reward or punishment but as an innate sequence. This sequence of deed and effect is as natural and necessary as the way of the sun and the moon.
Dhamma Niyama - order of the norm, e.g., the natural phenomena occurring at the advent of a Bodhisattva in his last birth. Gravitation and other similar laws of nature. The natural reason for being good and so forth, may be included in this group.
Citta Niyama - order or mind or psychic law, e.g., processes of consciousness, arising and perishing of consciousness, constituents of consciousness, power of mind, etc., including telepathy, telaesthesia, retro-cognition, premonition, clairvoyance, clairaudience, thought-reading and such other psychic phenomena which are inexplicable to modern science.
It’s nature, nurture, genes & karma that shape our future.
Most people misunderstand Karma/Vipaka, and there are more reasons for good and bad results (Vipaka). Maybe we can call it dependant origination, because our same Karma (action) can give different results on dependant origination (Patichcha Samuppadaya).
frank boase:
Suresh Madusanka
So far as the last 3 lines
"Maybe we can call it dependant origination, because our same Karma (action) can give different results on dependant origination (Patichcha Samuppadaya)"
I understand, then, with those 3 lines, you lose me.
Please explain.
Suresh Madusanka:
@frank boase, The five orders or processes (five niyama) are not only separated processes, but also sometimes those processes (niyama) interact with each other. Eg: If someone has very good previous Karma (Actions) and if they continue to do very good Karma, then it can cause to change other processes (niyama) like the order of germs and seeds (Bija Niyama). And also if we have a good scientific technology to fix the problems in the order of germs and seeds (Changing the Bija Niyama) then it can cause to change the Karma Niyama (order of act and result). So sometimes the Bija Niyama depends on Karma Niyama and also the Karma Niyama depends on Bija Niyama. And sometimes our new actions (new Karma) are strong enough to change other processes (niyama) too. So I think we can apply the dependent origination to the five orders or processes (niyama) too.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dependent Origination Workshop ||| (part 6) | Ajahn Brahmali and Venerable Sunyo | 14 November 2020
Suresh Madusanka:
The word Vijjā sounds like 'Science' or 'Technology' in Sinhala language (The Tipitaka was first written using Sinhala scripts). So maybe the meaning of the word Avijjā can be something like 'not knowing the science/technology' or 'not the standard science/technology (because the standard science/technology breaks down at the quantum level on the illusion of time)' or 'illusion'. And the meaning of the word 'Veda' is 'knowledge', so I don't think that the word Vijjā is much similar to the word 'Veda'.
I have a my own explanation about a good reason to guess the cause to make an illusion to form a conciousness being:
The double slit experiment shows us how the previous state of the quantum objects (particles) changed once we measure it. Quantum objects pass the double slit like waves making a wave pattern on the screen, but when we measure it near the screen it goes back in time and comes back to hit the screen like particles to show only two slits on the screen. So it sounds like that our interaction with the quantum objects can change the history of the quantum objects. Same like that, maybe if some natural events caused to form a consciousness to detect an interaction then it can change the history of those natural events which caused to form a consciousness to detect an interaction too. So, maybe that was the first ignorance (Pali: avijjā ) of a consciousness which lost the previous natural events (records) which caused to form a consciousness. And it seems that each and every consciousness is an illusion which sounds like its own creator on its own ignorance. However, the consciousness is just a part of some natural events, but the consciousness is almost fundamental too:
According to Buddhist quantum physics the origin of the smallest unit of matter, called a “suddhāṭṭhaka.” (sometimes written as suddhāshtaka). These eight never arise in isolation and thus are called “avinibbhoga rupa.” They always rise together; all eight are there in any suddhāṭṭhaka. The relative “amounts” of each component can vary, and thus some suddhāṭṭhaka can be dominated by one element, for example. Even then, all eight are present to some extent. From those, the most fundamental four units are called 'Satara mahā bhūta'.
Suresh Madusanka:
Another meaning to the word 'Vijjā' in Sinhala language is 'Magic', maybe because the word Vijjā sounds like 'Applying A Hidden Scientific Technology'. So maybe the meaning of the word 'Avijjā' sounds like 'Applying A Hidden Unscientific Technology' or 'Applying A Hidden Unacceptable Scientific Technology' or simply 'An Unacceptable Science' too.! I think the 'double slit experiment' shows us a something like 'Magic' from 'A Hidden Scientifically Unacceptable Technology'. However, maybe there are many meanings to the word Avijjā like 'Ignorence', 'Not Knowledge' etc.
Suresh Madusanka:
There are 3 dimensions for space and 1 dimension for time. But the main 6 directions of the Universe can have 6 dimensions. I think the Gravity belongs to only one dimension (5th dimension). And I think all the dimensions are time based lines (lines without strings or size). That is why the time can change when we observe it (Eg: Double-slit experiment). When we observe/measure a time line (a direction of a quantum particle), then it can cause to change the time of the entangled other time lines too. There are unstable time lines like 0.5 (spin), 2/3, -1/3 (charge) which came from the unstable 6th dimension of the Universe. So we should have a mathematical theory to find all the different types of 'time lines' to understand the symmetry of the Universe. According to my mathematical calculations the Gravity is a result of the separation from the symmetry between 5 and 6 dimensions to make the 5th stable dimension using a part from the 6th dimension making the 6th dimension unstable. So that can be the duality of the gravity which comes from the Mass (5th dimension) and the anti gravity called the Dark Energy from the 6th dimension.
The Universe should be balanced because it is symmetric. (The separation of the symmetry: (+0.0-0.0) x (+0.0-0.0) x (+0.0-0.0)) = (+(1)-(-(1))) x (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0))
The duality of the 6 directions and the 6 distances of the first start of the Universe: (+0-0)^6 + (-0+0)^6 = MATTER + ANTIMATTER
(+0-0)^6
=
i: (+1-(-1))^3
X
ii: (+0.0-0.0)^3
= ( This should be the Pure Eight (Pali: Suddhātthaka) in Buddhism:
Maybe there is a fundamental cause for the stable existence of the Heat, Solid, Liquid and Gas.
Step 1:
(+1-(-1))^3 =
Heat...: + (+1)^3
Solid..: - ((+1)^3 x (-1)
Liquid.: - ((-1)^2 x (+1)^2))
Gas....: + (-1)^2 x (+1)
- (
+ (+1)^2 x (-1)
- ((+1)^2 x (-1)^2
- ((-1)^3 x (+1)))
+ (-1)^3)
)) x
ii: (+0.0-0.0)^3
Step 2:
(+0.0-0.0)^3 = (+(1)-(-(1))) x (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)
Step 1 = (+1-(-1))^3 = 8 elementary particles
(Step 1) x (Step 2) =
(+1-(-1))^3 x (+(1)-(-(1))) x (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) = 8 elementary particles x (+(1)-(-(1))) = 16 elementary particles x (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)
Step 3:
(0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)
= nearly:
( Maybe there are 6 layers of elementary particles with spin (0.5 or 1/2), and Charge 2/3 and -1/3:
((+0.5......-(-0.5......)) + (+0.5......-(-0.5......)) + (+0.5......-(-0.5......))) x 1_..../(3/3) / 1_../(1/1) x (2,/3 / (1........x(7/7)) / 1......x(5/5) / (NEUTRAL)x(5/5) - 1....,/3) x 0.00000
According to my mathematical calculations, the unstable 6th dimension caused to make 1/2 Spin, 2/3 and -1/3 Charge, 6 layers of elementary particles, Combinations of layers etc.
- W. Suresh Madusanka
-----------------------------------------------
Our Mathematical Universe with Max Tegmark
Q&A - The mathematical universe with Max Tegmark
The Next Big Breakthrough in our Understanding of the Universe
Anirban Bandyopadhyay - Does Consciousness Defeat Materialism?
Julian Barbour on Time, the Universe, and Reality | Closer To Truth Chats
Farva Ali Khan:
Time is but a stubborn illusion ~Einstein .These kind of chats are interesting!
Suresh Madusanka:
I think the Universe is based on time lines.
-----------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------
Julian Barbour on "The Janus Point: A New Theory of Time" | Closer To Truth Chats: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FMD8B7VRX0w
Linus N:
Robert Kuhn is superb and his work has enlightened so many of us. Thank you Sir for the marvellous “Closer To The Truth”!
Closer To Truth:
Thanks, appreciate - but no "the" ;-) Robert
Suresh Madusanka:
@Closer To Truth, I have a theory of everything:
You can read more about my thoery from here (Page): 'The thoery of everything' at 'buddhist-essentials-and-concepts blogspot'
I tried to explain my theory to many people from few month. I don't know who could understand my theory about the entanglement of mathematical structures of the elementary particles (entangled time lines).
Thank you.
-----------------------------------------------
How to record a ghost particle – Public lecture by Dr. Wes Ketchum
Suresh Madusanka:
A wonderful lecture. Thank you so much for the information and profound presentation. Maybe that Neutrino Ghosts will show us ways to reveal a lot of hidden secrets of the Universe.
-----------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------
Garrett Lisi - Which Laws of Nature are Fundamental?
Kevin Phillips:
This really cries out for a 3D animation. Obviously, everyone in the comments is clueless.
Suresh Madusanka:
There are Elementary Ghosts called Pure Eight (Pali: Suddhātthaka) in Buddhism. And If we can explain the Mathematical Structures of it, then maybe we will be able to make a 3D or 6D animation of it too.
------------------------------------------------------------------
බෞද්ධ දැනුම් පද්ධතියේ තාක්ෂණික පැතිකඩ - #01
Suresh Madusanka:
බුදු දහමට අනුව 'ශුද්ධාෂ්ටක' ගැන සහ විශ්ව ගණිතයෙන් පරමාණු සෑදීම ගැන මා විසින් සොයාගත් ගණිතමය පැහැදිළි කිරීම: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ss62UnIHyY8
මැවුම් කරුවෙකු නොමැතිව විශ්වය සෑදීම -Dimensional Mathematical Structures Of The Elementary Particles: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ehQg2KkQNs
විශ්ව ගණිතයට අනුව විශ්වයේ උපත ගැන සරල ඉංග්රීසි බසින් මා විසින් ලියපු පොත (මුදල් ගෙවා අන්තර්ජාලය හරහා කියවන්න පුළුවන්. ශ්රී ලංකාව තුල තවම මුද්රණය කර නැහැ.): https://amzn.to/3me3NYM
-------------------------------------------------------------------
THE BEST OF THE WORLD RELIGIONS FROM BEST TO WORST: (MY OPINIONS)
1. Christianity- Its teachings benefit Humanity the most, focusing on renouncing unrighteousness and live in righteousness which one does by living according to God's standards. Least ritualistic and its rituals are easiest to practice (though not easy). Most followers. People can leave it if they want without capital punishment. Best preserved books and best quality writings (shared with Judaism). Provides best standard of living, most adaptable to the 21st Century and in best position to improve it. Able to coexist with other religions and its desire is to save souls. Most liberal dietary laws.
2. Buddhism- Its teachings mostly benefit Humanity, second only to Christianity. Focuses on denying worldly pleasures and desires in order to achieve Nirvana. It does not remedy Salvation like Christianity though. Its rituals are not extensive like others in this list. 4th most followers. People can leave Buddhism. Its books are preserved. It is unique in that in can adapt with the other world religions. Able to adapt to 21st century standards and able to improve it. Provides a standard of living that is somewhat difficult in heavily urbanized areas but mostly good. Able to coexist with other religions. Strict dietary laws.
3. Judaism- Its teachings are similar to Christianity which is why it is high up the list. Focuses on following strict rituals and purification rites to maintain holiness with God. Sadly, it focuses on mostly discontinued practices that God no longer cares for, though some are in effect still. Its rituals are numerous and complicated. People can leave Judaism. Its books are best preserved and best quality (along with Christianity), provides a standard of living that is good. Generally, urban areas with large Jewish populations score high in quality of living. ONLY CON: Too many rituals... That aside, able to coexist with other religions. Adaptable to 21st century and able to improve it. Most strict dietary laws.
4. Hinduism- Similar to Buddhism. I don't know much about it but I can't imagine it being more difficult to practice than Judaism, however, worshipping millions of gods must not be easy either. Can't speak much on it. Not a fan of their caste system. It is a religion that can adapt to the 21st century but not necessarily improve it. Strict dietary laws. Though able to coexist with other religions, it chooses to be intolerant of them here and there.
5. Islam- The worst of the world's religions. Its teachings dehumanize Humanity the most, focusing on blindly following the standards of Mohammed at the expense of other religions. Most ritualistic and its rituals are most difficult and oppressive to practice, consisting of many volumes of books. It has the 2nd most followers but this is mostly the result of high birth rates, people already being born and raised under an Islamic system, forced conversions where applicable and dawa propaganda in the West. People cannot leave it without capital punishment despite having the highest apostasy rate in 2020. Worst preserved books and worst quality writings. Provides worst standard of living, least adaptable to the 21st Century and a threat to Humanity. Not able to coexist with other religions and it must misrepresent and attack other religions to promote Islam. Strict dietary laws.
Sérgio Terra, That creator of the Universe was not a God. Read this book (maybe you will be shocked): "Finding The Entanglement Of Binary Mathematical Structures Of The Elementary Ghosts"
From the book:
My Philosophy about the Mathematical Physics of the Universe:
If we try to calculate the start of the Universe, then we can find the reasons to grow the Universe. I could make that calculation using the 6 main directions. And I didn't use any physical distance in order to start that calculation, because the Universe didn't have a distance to any direction in the beginning. I just show the distance like this +0-0 because it can show a direction without using a distance. We usually show directions with a distance like this (If distance from my school to my house = 1Km, then Distance = 1Km and Direction = my school to my house direction): 1km-0km = 1km. But we can show the 6 directions like this too: +0-0 left, +0-0 right, +0-0 up, +0-0 down, +0-0 front, +0-0 back.
Everything needs existing materials, so you must understand that, if you need to know about existence then you should know what existence is. The existence is not possible without non-existence. So the existence and non-existence are the existing materials.
The very first zero infinity (0∞ Real Emptiness) created two more forms of infinities (+Empty - Empty), but it was there from the start of the Zero (0) Universe with the infinity of the Zero (0) between the zero (0) and the infinity (∞) of the time of the early Universe until the dimensional interaction start to come from the zero (0) and the infinity (∞) of the first Universe. And then the time can try to go back to the zero (0) and the infinity (∞) too, but a small Dimensional unbalance (matter-antimatter ratio asymmetry) can prevent the time going back to zero (0) and infinity (∞), and then the time can continue and cause to save some dimensional characteristics of the Universe.
The Gravity is a result of the separation from the symmetry between 5 and 6 dimensions to make the 5th stable dimension using a part from the 6th dimension making the 6th dimension unstable. So that can be the duality of the gravity which comes from the Mass (5th dimension) and the anti gravity called the Dark Energy from the 6th dimension.
The Universe should be balanced because it is symmetric. (The separation of the symmetry: (+0.0-0.0) x (+0.0-0.0) x (+0.0-0.0)) = (+(1)-(-(1))) x (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0))
The duality of the 6 directions and the 6 distances of the first start of the Universe: (+0-0)^6 + (-0+0)^6 = MATTER + ANTIMATTER
(+0-0)^6
=
i: (+1-(-1))^3
X
ii: (+0.0-0.0)^3
= ( This should be the Pure Eight (Pali: Suddhātthaka) in Buddhism:
Maybe there is a fundamental cause for the stable existence of the Heat, Solid, Liquid and Gas.
Step 1:
(+1-(-1))^3 =
Heat...: + (+1)^3
Solid..: - ((+1)^3 x (-1)
Liquid.: - ((-1)^2 x (+1)^2))
Gas....: + (-1)^2 x (+1)
- (
+ (+1)^2 x (-1)
- ((+1)^2 x (-1)^2
- ((-1)^3 x (+1)))
+ (-1)^3)
)) x
ii: (+0.0-0.0)^3
Step 2:
(+0.0-0.0)^3 = (+(1)-(-(1))) x (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)
Step 1 = (+1-(-1))^3 = 8 elementary particles
(Step 1) x (Step 2) =
(+1-(-1))^3 x (+(1)-(-(1))) x (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) = 8 elementary particles x (+(1)-(-(1))) = 16 elementary particles x (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)
Step 3:
(0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)
The unstable 6th dimension caused to make 1/2 Spin, 2/3 and -1/3 Charge, Layers of the elementary particles, Combinations of layers etc.
- W. Suresh Madusanka
A Mind Boggling Quantum Theory DOCUMENTARY The Universe Appears to be Recreating Itself
Science Documentary 2016: The Math Mystery Mathematics in Nature and Universe
Elementary Magics & Mathematical Structures Of The Entangled Dimensions (The Theory Of Everything?)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do we need a Theory of Everything? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mdu9KvLxHFg
Sabine Hossenfelder:
I get constantly asked if I could please comment on other people’s theories of everything. That could be Garrett Lisi’s E8 theory or Eric Weinstein’s geometric unity or Stephen Wolfram’s idea that the universe is but a big graph, and so on. First I explain what physicists mean by a theory of everything and by grand unification (or a grand unified theory, respectively). Then I explain why the current approaches are no very promising but why, forgive me, I nevertheless think it's good to have them.
KEF:
This why I love your channel , you don't just accept things and you are very critical of the state of today's physics . That's the mentality needed , if we are to keep going forward in the advancement of physics . And yes the universe doesnt give a damn ,what we want or what we think as pretty . It is what is it .
Suresh Wanayalae:
Sometimes people ignore cause until they see the effect.
robert flynn:
@Suresh Wanayalae + life
Suresh Wanayalae:
@robert flynn, Sub title of my book (search): "Finding The Theory Of Everything with Entangled Time Dimensions".
This video is about it (search the video after 10th Aprill 2021): "Elementary Magics & Mathematical Structures Of The Entangled Dimensions (The Theory Of Everything?)"
It is a new type of mathematical explanation about the existence of the Universe. And it explains how some ratios can make mass and higgs boson with an atomic structure.!
Just read my previous comments for more details.!
robert flynn:
@Suresh Wanayalae do you know or read the actual theories you are telling us , or do you invent.
Your comment sure changed every body else. Good going even if I can't understand it. Robert
Just a note Suresh; I read a book on the Upanishads. Hindu languages.
They are four dimensional writings. Do you know about this 🤔
robert flynn:
@Suresh Wanayalae Rg Vedic Languages. Four Dimensional man.
+Life.
Suresh Wanayalae:
@robert flynn, It is a my own theory, and I discovered it. I don't know much about Upanishads, but it is a later development of Vedas. And I guess it was written after the time of the Buddha, so I can guess that some Hindus could learn a lot of things from Buddhism to write their new books.
Brahmanism is older than Buddhism, but Brahmanism doesn't exist now. Brahmans made Hinduism to make an indian empire (Mahābhārata), because the Buddhism was a challenge to the Brahmin's caste system. The Vedas are older than Buddhism, but all other books were written in Sanskrit language, and the most Hindu books are not older than 400 BCE. So Buddhism is older than Hinduism.
A category about central philosophical concepts and ideas of Hinduism called 'Upanishads' were made using Veda, after the time of the Buddha. These Hindu Books were written after the time of the Buddha (Buddha lived within 6th century BCE):
Vishnu Purana (1st millennium BCE to early 2nd-millennium CE. actual author(s) and date of its composition are unknown and contested. Some proposed 400-300 BCE. Vishnu Purana, like all major Puranas, attributes its author to be Vyasa.)
Mahābhārata (not much older than around 400 BCE, and the text probably reached its final form in 4th century CE) written by Vyasa
Bhagavad Gita may have been composed in or after the 3rd-century BCE (3 centuries after the Buddha)
Valmiki's Ramayana (500 BCE to 100 BCE)
The Hebrew Bible were also wrttern after the time of the Buddha, because the Hebrew writing was thought to stretch back no further than 6th century B.C., (Buddha lived 6th century BC). According to Louis Ginzberg's Legends of the Jews, the twenty-four book canon of the Hebrew Bible was fixed by Ezra and the scribes in the Second Temple period. [The Second Temple period in Jewish history lasted between 516 BCE and 70 CE,[1] when the Second Temple of Jerusalem existed.]
500 Enlightened (Arhat) Sri Lankan Buddhist Monks wrote Buddhist Tipitaka in the Pali language around 100 BCE. And the Buddhist Tipitaka was prepared 3 months after the death of the Buddha. They chanted it to remember it. So the Buddhist Tipitaka is older than 5th Century BCE.
Buddha mentioned about Brahma and Brahmins, but Buddha didn't mention about Vishnu, Rama and Krishna, because at that time the Rama and Krishana was not Avatars of Vishnu. And the Vishnu was not considered powerful than Brahma (Maha Brahma). But later new Hindu Books made Vishnu powerful than Brahma. In Vedas you can't find a creator God, but there were 33 Gods in Vedas. Brahamins believed that the Brahma was a creator, but Buddha rejected it. I'm just saying that we can't prove that the Oral Sanskrit Vedas were 100% same as the Written Sanskrit Vedas which was written after 500 BCE. I'm not saying that there were not any Written Sanskrit Vedas before 500 BCE, but we don't have any evidence to prove that Written Sanskrit Vedas existed before 500 BCE, because we can't find the original copies of the Written Sanskrit Vedas before 500 BCE. So you can't prove that the word Avatar and the Avatars of Vishnu in Vedas existed before 500 BCE, and I'm saying that they added it into Vedas after 500 BCE. But I can accept that there were many other Oral Sanskrit Vedas (knowledge) before 500 BCE.
"'The word avatar does not appear in the Vedic literature, however it appears in developed forms in post-Vedic literature, and as a noun particularly in the Puranic literature after the 6th century CE. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avatar)"
However, they used/using the new Hindu books to challenge Buddhism. But they behave like they didn't know about the Buddha, because they wrote a 5000 years old story Mahabharat after 2700 years (300 years after buddha). But they ignored the Buddha a lot to make Hinduism a separate religion, but they sometimes try to make Buddha an Avatar of Vishnu, but those Hindus forgot to write a book about the Buddha. All the major religions organized after the establishment of the Buddhism. Buddhism was a world religion: Afghanistan-Pre-Islamic Era: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PMm9zCh_BxI And still Buddhism is the OLDEST well organised (established) major religion on the earth. Other major religions organised (established) later with new books.
robert flynn:
@Suresh Wanayalae ok .
Look up: Lisi Theory of Everything.
Compare: the algebra form you developed to the geometric forms of Lisi.
You will see if you models are ✅ right by comparing your results to Lisi results.
Suresh Wanayalae:
@robert flynn, I predicted about an existence of 8 fundamental elementary ghosts (particles or like Pure Eight/ 8 bhūtā: Suddhāṭṭhaka). There is a similarity between the Standard Model of Elementary Particles and my dimensional mathematical structures of the Elementary Ghosts. According to my calculations there are around 64 elementary magics/ghosts (quantum particles) which can easily interact with each other and there are 32 elementary magics which can't easily interact with each other (including a section for antimatter and higgs boson). According to calcuations of my thoery the Quarks, Leptons and Higgs bosons are groups of dimensional mathematical structures which has a range or a cyclic path that can make the standard mass of the elementary particles.!.
I compare the mathematical structures of my theory with the values of the elementary particles in the Standard Model of particle physics. Scientists (including Dr. Higgs) could predict the existence of a particle called the "Higgs Boson" which has a mass around 125.10 +0.14-0.14 GeV. But scientists expected a higher mass for the Higgs boson. According to my mathematical ratios I guess that there is ANOTHER Higgs Boson with a mass around 4000 (or maximum 4800) GeV. But with the 27km long LHC energies scientists currently can discover a mass around 1000 Gev only. However, there is a plan to make a 100km long "Future Circular Collider" to continue their research about the elementary particles. But it can take more than 20 (30 or more) years to find money to make it.
robert flynn:
@Suresh Wanayalae 😊
I know what your doing.
'Lisi' works with quantum gravity, a company in calif.
You and he are doing same theory.
'Lisi' works from math of ",Lie derivatives ": group theory.
You need to understand his approach . Just do this now. Let me know what you find out.
You could contact those people with you ideas..maybe.
Good luck. Robert
Search: Lisi. On your computer first and read his bio.
Note: your theory is also encoded into the hymns songs and 4 dimensional languages logics of the Upanishads. Trust me
Suresh Wanayalae:
@robert flynn I searched about it. I guess you are talking about the E8 theory ("An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything) by Garrett Lisi.. However, I don't know about his theory. And his Lie groups (around 248) doesn't match with my elementary magics (around 96). And I think his description about the E8 doesn't match with my description about the 8 fundamental elementary ghosts (like Pure Eight/ Suddhāṭṭhaka in Buddhism).
You can read my book to understand my theory: "Finding The Theory Of Everything with Entangled Time Dimensions" www.amazon.com/dp/B08QG3F8M8.
I will publish a video about it on 10th Aprill 2021.
My thoery is not only about a 4 dimensional universe. I explain about 4 main dimensions and 1 stable sub dimension with 1 unstable dimension. I don't think Upanishads is helpful for me, because I already found some helpful details from Buddhist Abhidamma (Pure Eigh, Pure 8 + 5 senses can make more fundamental elements (Chitta), 28 material phenomena, 51 smallest moments of a matter (Rupa) area etc) and a hint from our culture about a 64 types of magics (in women). And I watch videos of the Fermilab, PBS Space Time YouTube channels etc to learn more about Quantum Physics and Universe.
robert flynn:
@Suresh Wanayalae ok Suresh I am happy you at least looked at it.
From what I know Suresh Lisi crystal 🔮 models if E8 with Lie
Groups accounts for all particles in standard
Models. Thats pretty great. Plus his groups versus your own groups of forms in "0" etc has 'light in his E8 crystal and not gravity.
I like yours because it starts with your numbers and already fits standard model you said .
I am reminded of an article I read in 1995 in discover mag on the 'quantum languages of bees' in their 'forms' of dances on hives forms. As if they already knew of
.quark theory. You are like that case so. .. I think by making algebraic "0" forms as you do its more like our empty spaces in our brains consciousness when we're born.
Whereas in Lisi E8 theory he used physics own Lie groups he already knew fit std Models. His Lie groups are calculus based yours are number algebras only.
Thus I can imagine both you 2 are thinking about same theory of everything. Can of course be only 1 and you and Lisi must come out same . Lots of fun talking to you Suresh. Your very clever in languages . I am a lot older and worked in computer software and did some patents etc in nanotechnology.
Keep posting and ill see how you do bye.
robert flynn:
@Suresh Wanayalae I bought the paperback of your book Suresh. Bye
Suresh Wanayalae:
@robert flynn, My theory is based on time dimensions which can start from zero (0). I don't think that I need to change my theory, and it showed me many similarities to the Standard Model of Particle Physics and other things (predictable structures and particles etc) more than I can think. And received only one result from my theory which I can't change to match it with the elementary particles of the standard model, but I already found an atomic structure, higgs field, antimatter and a clear reason to think why the Up Quark is smaller than the Down Quark. And I found some groups of formations of dimensions (moments/ elementary magics) which can have charastaristics of Dark Matter. And I can guess how my theory can explain gravity too. According to my model (structure of the elementary magics) Down Quarks and Strange Quarks are different types of sets, but the Bottom Quark use the sets of both Down Quarks and Strange Quarks. Up Quark starts after the Down Quark, therefor the Top Quark reach the set of the higgs section too, but there are only 4 main sections of sets for matter with different types of starts. There are 4 main sections for antimatter too, but with a weak Higgs section. So (Today 11-2-2021) I looked at quarks to understand the decay process of those elementary particles, and then I could see that the Strange Quark doesn't decay into a Down Quark which I could predict from my sets of the elementary magics. And the Bottom Quark can decay into the nearest mass which is the Charm Quark, because those Quarks use the same sets to form those particles. I just have to give enough time to develop it and understand it. But I still didn't give enough time to think about those things, because I was busy with my business and rest.
Thank you for your replies and information.!
Bye.
Suresh Wanayalae:
@robert flynn , Thank you so much if you ordered the paperback of my book. I'll be able to confirm it few days later.
Good Bye.
robert flynn:
@Suresh Wanayalae any way to get you to sign a book for me I would love to have that.
I keeping tabs on you. Were very alike . YES. BOTH INTO
SOFTTWARE AND
MY PATENTS WILL DO IN HARDWARE , NANO, WHAT YOU ARE DOING IN TOE SOFTWARE.
Best of good things. Robert.
Suresh Wanayalae:
@robert flynn, I don't know how I can sign a book for you. Maybe I'll be able to mail a note to you. I just learned web development, so I'm not good in software development. (this is not a good place to discuss about those things on some restrictions.). However, I could see that you bought my book, so thank you so much for that. You are the first person who bought my book, so I would like to know the name of your country.
robert flynn:
@Suresh Wanayalae yes, there's problems for signing books. I am glad I bought one. I live in az, USA. I think its purchased from Amazon. Lets wait, ok. Maybe someday you'll be famous. Lol 😆 I am hardware and you're software. I worked IBM.
Suresh Wanayalae:
@robert flynn, Thanks for trying to understand my explanations. Amazon prints and delivers my book. I have positive feelings about USA and Western countries. I guess those countries used their power to protect Asia from highly violent muslim invaders and helped Asia to establish democracy, because christianity is a peaceful religion than some christians. However, I wanted to help Buddhists and others to find answers for some important questions, because some ignorant organized groups try to argue with Buddhists using wrong information (Eg: about evolution, fabrications about the universe etc). Currently we don't have a good theory and a technology to predict the future, so we should wait and see. I can understand about your abilities. I just want to show my theory to scientists and mathematicians to develop it more to use it practically (because it should work). I don't mind even if you print copies of my book and sell or share the book for free. However, thank you so much Mr. Robert for everything.
Suresh Wanayalae:
According to my analysis the the Strange quark is a combination of the Down Quark and Up Quark sections. But the dimensions of the Down Quark is Larger than the Dimensions of Up Quark, so maybe that is why the Strange quark decays into an Up Quark. However, according to my analysis an Up Quark doesn't make larger quarks directly. Strange quarks should join with other sections to make a Charm quark too. And the Bottom Quarks should join with other sections to make a Top Quark. However, I hope to analyse it more later. Thank you. Bye for now.!
robert flynn:
@Suresh Wanayalae don't worry Suresh. Everything's fine. Already received book.
I won't do anything on your ideas at all.
Suresh Wanayalae:
@robert flynn, I'm glad about everything you said. However, I meant, I just want to spread that theory and explanations quickly without thinking about my benefit. I like to see people talking about it, because it can change the minds of a lot of people. And I like to see it develop more soon. Today (15-02-2021) I tried to find the position of electron and neutrino. According to my analysis I could find a formation like an electron neutrino (and the smallest electron is at the top-left corner after the higgs section). And I think there is a neutral formation at electron section and an electron volt (eV) start from a combination of 3 electron sections (electron section x 3 - 3 neutral formations - smallest electron) which can finally line up 14 formations which is like 1 eV. However, I'll try to publish my analysis later.
Thank you.
robert flynn:
@Suresh Wanayalae for you to watch. See where you fit into future, Suresh.. https://youtu.be/WnKeZm2J8VQ"
robert flynn:
@Suresh Wanayalae here is 2 other points:
Check out the Indian boy
RAMANJUAN
he come from India when 19 and was
invited to oxford england earlier 2oth century 19xx by three people
1 J. Hardy. Depth math head
2 prof. Louis Mordell.
3 prof. Littlewood
They helped him publish his math. He died soon after.
I was at univ. of Arizona and met Dr.
Mordell a genius himself in number theory and was taught by him at U of A . Thats how I know.
You'll probably have to do same.
Watch this video to where you and toe fits today..
https://youtu.be/WnKeZm2J8VQ
IN VIDEO : see what dr. Frank Wilczek says. Its important for you to see. The TOE fits in to what he is now doing. He discovered part of TOE. SEE IT AND DECIDE.
Suresh Wanayalae:
@robert flynn, Yes, thank you so much for sending me that video. I could see the similarity clearly. He said that they need 3 numbers to describe a quibit, and I said we need 3 formations to make 1 eV, so now I think a combination of 3 smallest electron is like an quibit, and the next formation is 3x3 posibilities with 2x3 posibilites which is equal to 15 posibilities are the next formation, but I said 14 posibilities for that because I removed a smallest electron from it to compare it with the latest mass of a neutrino (0.07 eV) because 1/14 is equal to around 0.07 (0.0714), but 1/15 is equal to around 0.7 (0.666) too, so I can use those 15 posibilities without a problem. And I think those 15 posibilites are equal to 1 eV.
I hope my guess it correct. We will be able to confirm it and more things soon or later. I'll try to find details about RAMANJUAN. Thank you for your support Mr. Robert.
robert flynn:
@Suresh Wanayalae you are hot on the trail of higgs fields coming apart such as dr frank wilczek thinks too.
Mass of neutrino can be 3 types in so(10) symmetry theory. Ex. Can be a Dirac relativistic electrons. Like you gave. Your basically recording in your "theory" what is called dimensional parity..like direction in emptiness.
The whole theory says when a neutron decays comes apart higgs
occur first in time. Frank Wikczek
Developed the model 20 years ago and won the nobel prize much later.
Thats why he switching to how 'mind' comes out of matter.
He is the one you'll need to pass you theory book to.
Robert
robert flynn:
@Suresh Wanayalae one last but important question about your brain processes..
Do you think it includes repulsive gravity in higgs fields or parties of the +/- 1 , o. Maybe as +/- ( i) as a sequence. Maybe infinite. This is gravity in toe. i2. = -1. The ghost or imaginary dimensions.
Give this some deep thoughts ok. No big deal if you cant.
Suresh Wanayalae:
@robert flynn, Sometimes I just used the word neutrino to mention the electron neutrino. I think electron neutrino interact from spin only, and electron neutrinos are not pairs because it doesn't have a dimension to make charge. Maybe a repulsive Spin which changes like 1/2 to 0.5 (dimensions) gives a repulsive (betweeen 0.5/15 to 1/15) mass (0.07 eV or ) for it. Maybe neutrnos can come aprart higgs because I think neutrinos has a repulsive relativistic spin (and maybe that process obtain energy from electrons or any other place which can create new electron neutrinos too. And then it can come out like matter comes out of mind). However, I need to study more about neutrinos.
I don't know how I can pass my theory to Dr. Frank Wikczek. However, thanks for your advise.
Suresh Wanayalae:
@robert flynn, Maybe the gravity is the smallest duration of time inside a smallest dimensional formation. (Eg: A smallest formation with +3 dimensions has 3 smallest moments of gravity.) I think the gravity is not a dimension, but it is a smallest momentum or a duration of a dimension (in smallest quantum level) which interacts with a result of a seperation of a universal symmetry. I think we can find gravity in everything including higgs field.
Just let me know if you have important questions. Maybe I'll not be able to answer, but we can think about posibilities. I'm just analysing, thinking and guessing to find answers by myself (Suresh).
Suresh Wanayalae:
@robert flynn, Updates (and corrections) about analysis: Yesturday (21-02-2021) I could identify the correct location of the smallest electron. It is at the top-left corner after the higgs section of matter area, and it has 3 extra dimensions which makes it possible to make 1 Qubit (with 3 posibilities/directions) of it. If we take the Higgs section as the 1st section then there are two types of photons (like electro+magnetism) at the bottom of the higgs section. And there are two types of neutrinos at the last group of the 3rd section. If we take the start of the opposite side (right side) as the 1st section of the antimatter area, then I think the gluon originated from the last group of the 4th section of the antimatter area. According to the my way of calculations, a smallest Electron has a +1 Charge as (+3 +3/3). And a smallest Down Quark has a 1/3 Charge as (+3 +1/3). And a smallest Up Quark has a -2/3 Charge as -(+3 +2/3). I hope to analyse more soon or later, and maybe I'll send it to here too, but I don't expect a reply from you Mr. Robert. Thank you.
robert flynn:
@Suresh Wanayalae you will get your response, Suresh.
Everything you said is Correct!
Don't give up keep going.
Gravity ie quantum gravity will be the directions on smallest of your standard tables. Codes the curvature from hadron condensed matter of quarks and gluons. That is beautiful. Codes just like dna Codes ie. 4x4x4 = 64 possible possible curvatures.. but only 21 are unique. Agrees to 64 possible amino acid codes in dna.. taken 3 at a time.. there are 21 amino acides making up dna. Just passing this to you from past things I know. Theres a book I can say later, Suresh.💫
Light come from einsteins curvature. .. call kalusza Klein idea 💡 the fifth smallest dimensions.
Everything is made from light dimensions..just like it really happened before big bang.
Changed my logo image haha
'Someone out there said "little red corvette" from Prince song of same name. Hope you like this. Robert flynn.
robert flynn:
@Suresh Wanayalae the little red corvette song
https://youtu.be/v0KpfrJE4zw
Suresh Wanayalae:
@robert flynn, Sometimes it is difficult for me to understand English songs etc. Thank you for your response. I was busy on my grandmother's funeral. And sometimes I take a lot of time to think before I reply. However, sometimes I collect ideas to find hints to start thinking about some difficult problems. Currently I don't have enough clues to start thinking about the process of gravity (including quantum gravity) and the speed of light. Maybe I should think about the end of the Universe and about Dark Energy before I think about the process of gravity. I don't know whether the fundamental force of gravity change (maybe relatively change) or not. Maybe the gravity has a connection with the spin of the elementary particles, and maybe the relationships with the constants make the process of gravity so complex, or maybe the gravity depends on many different types of Big Bangs etc. (I guess the next Big Bang will not make the same type of atoms. And according to Buddhism a Buddha will not appear in the next Universe (after the next big bang/ next aeon), but a Buddha will appear after the end of that Universe (around after 2 aeons)) Maybe we should know everything about the process of the Universe to explain the process of gravity and speed of light. However, there are a lot more things to think first.
Nice to know about that strucure of DNA Codes Mr. Robert.
I try to study and think about those things specially on Saturdays and Sundays. I hope I'll have enough time to think about those things soon.
I think you like to change and discover new things Mr. Robert. There are a lot of things we don't know yet, so we can't stop finding those things, but sometimes we should try to understand our limits and potentials too. Maybe our mind is able to observe and discover a lot of things better than anything else.
- Suresh Madusanka
robert flynn:
@Suresh Wanayalae it was a pleasure to hear about you, Suresh.
Your so close to the answer. Prince was a great talent in USA.
Quantum gravity.
See video coming up on
This Saturday, Suresh.
Arvin ashe. He does vids on hard subjects.
Talking about quantum gravity Saturday. Be cool. Robert
Suresh Wanayalae:
@robert flynn , Thanks for encouragements. Sometimes I watch Arvin ashe YouTube Channel, and I hope to watch his previous videos and upcoming videos too. I really like his channel so much. I'll have to learn to use planck constant and other constants with relevant theories. I hope to try to connect the 51 smallest moments of a matter area in Buddhist Abhidharma with the wave function or the plank length in quantum machanics. According to my standard model of the dimensional formations there are 48 sets of dimensions in the matter area. And there is an empty section between the matter and antimatter area. So that can make 49 smallest moments of continuation in matter area. And according to Abhidharma there are 2 smallest moments to start and end a matter area. If my standard formations represent that 51 smallest moments of a matter area then maybe it can help to answer some important questions.
I'll try to unite new and old theories to find answers. I hope we will be able to find something important Mr. Robert.
robert flynn:
@Suresh Wanayalae here is the vid to watch..
Quantum holonomy theory
Ie quantum gravity
Arvin ash
https://youtu.be/fSVbWwivu5g
Send him a good complement fron you.
Suresh Wanayalae:
@robert flynn, That vid explains about singularity, and a little bit about Quantum Gravity. I couldn't find a dimension for gravity, but maybe the gravity has a connection with the arising (birth) and the vanishing (cease) process of a dimension (in the matter area) at the antimatter area, or between the empty section at the matter and antimatter area. That empty section doesn't have a dimensional connection between the matter area and antimatter area, so that can be the end of a dimensional interaction which behaves like gravity. And maybe a repulsion at that empty section behaves like antigravity (dark energy). And maybe there is a gap between the birth of gravity and the birth of antigravity which doesn't allow them to annihilate each other (maybe the antigravity is the start of making a dimension on repulsion at the empty section to start a standard dimension at the matter area.). Maybe the gravity goes to the infinite emptiness while antigravity comes from the infinite emptiness.
I'll try to find the mathematics of quantum gravity soon or later Mr. Robert.
robert flynn:
@Suresh Wanayalae what you said is pretty interesting I thought. Basically we need more quarks!! Theory uses 1/3 +/- buts thats not enough charges for gravity sub curvatures. The are 4. There are many universes, many quarks you can't see them. Ghosts..dark matter for example need to be in everything and not there. They call it supersymmetry and infinite strings. Background before big bang . There was only a quark gluob plasma and dark higgs fields before big bang. It started to divide like birth of cells. And then big bang. Out of that cooling comes 4. Matter, dark matter. Antimatter. And, anti dark matter options. No light yet. Solid darkness almost. Nothing.
Its hard to find a spot for gravity dimensions in fact that's the unification problem, Suresh.
In the Ash video he did not into details it hard math Ash chickened out. I am studying the Memphis 3 cold case files. . New information on the killings of 3 boys in woods . Damion went to prison,, with friends in 1995. Been there tillb5 years ago wrongful conviction I think. Now 2 other boys at the time have confessed to something recently. I am interested in murder cases generally. Looked into others last 2 years. Thats another thing I do.
Ok. The answer is where you put the quarks and gluons in your model its the charges on quarks need to be more types.
Tell me where you think they go.
According to the video we watched Arvin was silent. Go back to video and look at my comment up near front and I put a link to more videos. Watch that first. It's little deeper. I hope Arvin is ok on this
Gravity is new. Part of quark dimensions... there the "smallest"
And they 4x4x4. Combination to be like dna 4 bases. You need more fractions not 1/3. But 1/5ths to agree to theory. There many, more than 3 quarks.. theres dark quarks andd may use the imaginary math signs ie. -1 to -1/2 power.. Square root. Look up imaginary numbers online to see. Math symbol is "+/ - i... fractions you need are 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, 1/5.. su(5) in quark theory.
See where these quarks get smaller or smallest sub dimensions.
We can call these new places in your tables. Repulsion.. the field lines spread out like repulsion lines. They get more and more. There are like imaginary and infinite.
You probably did not plan fir these.
But they are there and like life's coding beginnings. Thats my conjecture. In the video link in Arvin Ash in my comment.
Your up late by usa time..after 1am
I stay up late. I was looking at houses for sale in brighton Beach england. They are much $$$. The cure band lives there. Ha ha. Its really funny as one of my other youtube channel comments was answered "robert smith" lead singer and quitarist but used a secret cided id name butbi knew.
Find the quarks and gluons first and tell me where you them put them, ok. 👋
Suresh Wanayalae:
@robert flynn, Nice to know about you, and I could understand what you said Mr.Robert, and I watched that video about the "The Concept of Holonomy", but I'm not smart enough (or maybe I don't have enough time) to follow that type of complex mathematics to find a reason to quantum gravity. And maybe a small misunderstanding about a curvature of a dimension can waste a lot of time, or maybe some dimensions don't curve or bend sometimes. Therefor, I think we should try to follow simple ratios and simple structures and virtual shapes first to find a something like a constant which we can use as an extension to the mathematics of the general relativity, because maybe we will be able to replace the Mass or the speed of light with something else to find a big reason to the existence of gravity, or maybe we will be able to change the current mathematics of quantum mechanics to find a small reason to a requirement to exist quantum gravity.
According to my Standard Model there are black and gray ranges which I can't explain yet. And the bottom two ranges doesn't have a normal 0.5 (1/2), because maybe it has two spins like +0.5+0.5 or sometimes as 1/2 or 0.5/1 + 0.5/1. And there are few parts at the top of my standard model which I can't expain yet, So I think maybe my standarm model will be enough to explain about Dark Matter, formation of Black Holes, Ghosts, Heavenly beings etc. Today (01-03-2021) I could see that the gluon should be originated at matter area (not in antimatter area which I mentioned before), because according to may model the gluon should should originate from a negative (-3) force with 3 positive dimensions (+(1)x(+1)x1) to balance it. And that gluon had a -1/3 charge which cancelled out on the +1 spin of it (and it can change the spin of gluon too, as changing a dimension which can cause a movement as an inward pressure) because it is at the bottom range of the matter area, which made the smallest gluon partially neutral. The smallest Up Quark should be the second set of the 1.2.4.1.1 group. And the smallest Down Quark should be the first set in the 1.2.4.1.2.1 group. The charge of the smallest Up Quark and smallest Down Quark make the protons and neutrons which eventually attract smallest electrons. However, I think the dimension of those particles in a matter area start from the antimatter area and end at the antimatter area within 51 smallest moments and it starts again with a very tiny change each time (which can happen according to the abhidharma too) as a cyclic process.
The mathematical technical aspects of the 6 main directions made my standard model with 3 main ranges which is symmetric like this 2/3, 1/3, 1/3 on 3 dimensions and also it is symmetric on the spin like this 0.5, 0.5, 1. Therefor I can't see a requirement to change my standard model. And I think I know that it will explain a lot of things even if it can take a long time to understand it. Sometimes I'm tough on my decisions because sometimes I don't have doubts about the process or path I followed. However, We will have to find a way to use it more practically. And I think we can use simple calculations to explain about the things we know, but maybe we will need complex calculations to explain about the things we don't know.
Sometimes the mass comes from interactions (Eg: the mass of electron), and maybe the smallest quarks get mass from interactions too. And maybe the mass is based on jumps between sets, groups and sections (fields) in matter area too.
I'll reply again on Saturday or Sunday Mr. Robert. Best of luck.
Suresh Wanayalae:
@robert flynn, I could see another posibility in my calculations which I ignored while making my standard model, because I wanted to make it simple and maybe we can't expect 2 posibilities at once. But If I used that posibility from another side then I could make another standard model with a very small difference to the other standard model. So maybe there are two slightly different standard models. So I'll see whether I should update my standard model with another standard model or not. It will depend on requirements, discoveries and posibilities. However, maybe my current standard model will be enough to explain a lot things. I'll reply again later Mr. Robert. I hope to think more about posibilities of my calculations. But currently I'm a little bit busy with few more things.
robert flynn:
@Suresh Wanayalae ill give us both time on this.
But, I like having more than 1 std. Model. Why? You will need to connect the more than 1 std models by something NEW. May need more no. of quarks per proton or more gravity mass properties to each quark. All gravity changes.
The current std model which you are using too has only 3 quarks per proton or neutron. Right
? But the quarks have other properties like charges (but fraction 1/3 etc,,) like you said. And spins and flavors etc. This gives us every "known" particles seen in hadron collider. No gravitons. Important.
But remember.. this model does NOT
include any gravity attraction or repulsion
There are 2 known approaches I've seen. 1. To put gravity issues ie the curvatures 4x4x4, into a quantum..this called renormalization. 2. Recently, the reverse, to put the quantum eg.
Quarks. Somehow into gravity. These are called quantum tensors.
You can search on " quantum tensors" to check me out. Relativity has to change. In 1. Quantum theory ie quarks has to change.
The other case is the cases 1. and 2. Come very close but join by
Lights theory. The quarks join by
Entanglement. Velocity then must change speed of light. To allow 4 cases. Of infinity plus four signs.
You can probably now find many standard tables connected by
light in entanglements.
Why have one?? Its depending on what connecting to gravity does !!
Just one std table won't work I think but let's spent a bit on discussing these options.
Now then holonomy is new. Ash. But its been around. I had a paper on it.
What it says we start with motion like humans move.. left and right spin rotation, which are angular pieces of change. And like a spherical surface are not linear.
No such thing as linear motion. All angular spin changes approximate motions. The the video shows how this is applied to quantum theory.
So its like approach 2. Above. Check me out here. Tensors have change, and so relativity is changed. Quantum theory and quarks by holonomy theory is being written now like Arvin said. Thats why here chickened out. So here this model does not work in your simple math tables I think since you don't have symbols for 'angular ," signs. Do you?
Correct me if I err here in last comment. Ok?
Let me know when free.
Bye robert.
robert flynn:
@Suresh Wanayalae Tuesday FYI Suresh.
On question were talking about ie smaller dimensions
https://youtu.be/ZorRPAD32i4
Suresh Wanayalae:
@robert flynn , There are fixed spins (0.5 and 1) and fixed 3 dimensions (/3) in my standard model. And I included a possible or probable spin ((1/2) x2) which can interact with 3 fixed dimensions (eg: (1/2) x 2 x /3 into this 3/5), but I'm not sure about that yet. The standard charges have extra dimensions (eg: 4/3, 5/3, 6/3), and there are lower charges too (eg: 1/3, 2/3). Both Up Quarks (-(1x1x1x2/3)) and Down Quarks (1x1x2/3) have extra charges. I guess most +1 and -1 dimensions don't bend or curve, but maybe the 0.5 spin dimension bend or curve through the entire universe instantly, and it returns instantly, which we can't calculate, but maybe it can cause gravity, or if +1 and -1 spins cancelled on a dimension then it can cause gravity (or anti gravity) too. But we can't calculate those very small differences using big variables.
Maybe there is a fundamental separation between large objects (eg: Black Holes) and small objects (Eg: Atoms) like an energy barrier. And maybe we need another type of matter area (matter ranges) to explain the origination of things like Dark Matter, Black Holes, Neutron Stars, High-energy (Heavy) Cosmic Rays etc. If the mathematics of the universe make 2 standard models, then I think it can make the same type of sub atomic particles and atoms after every big bang (after every aeon). And if a force can combine those two standard models (maybe after somehow the Black Holes absorb all the dark matter or after all the Dark Matter annihilate on a mathematical symmetry of space after the Black Holes evaporate on Radiation, it can try to annihilate or shrink some areas of space too. And maybe the expansion of the edge of the universe will produce more space than matter on flattening the curvature of the expanding edge. And eventually the dimensions of space will not help to balance the symmetry of the universe.), then it can end the Universe as a cyclic process. Maybe the existing space will be a medium to help the expanding edge to come back to a starting point virtually like exchanging space with the edge of the universe during the next big bang, instantly filling the expanding edge with existing empty space, which can start to behave like Dark Energy on the influence of gravity of new matter at the expanding edge of the universe. I explained it based on 3 posible separations of a symmetry in my calculations: (+0.0-0.0)^3 become this (+(1)-(-(1))) x (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) and then it can change the direction converting to this (+0.0-0.0) x (0.000 - 0.000) x (+(1)-(-(1))) and then to the 3rd direction as a cyclic process. And maybe the Universe has three types of destructions like explained in Buddhism as 64 destructions by air, water and heat (collapsing a quantum strcuture of a fundamental element / collapsing a particular type of entangled dimensions in space etc) with a destruction ratio 1:7:56.
It will take time to find unknow things, but if we try to find the first step first then we will be able to find the second step too. Thanks for your information Mr.Robert.
robert flynn (.........@gmail.com): Our work on YouTube. March6 2021
Hi there Suresh;
The youtube on sabrine was blocking any further communication back to you. Set at 98 comments maybe 100 is a limit?
Let me know if you get these and we can go on from there.
Suresh Wanayalae (smlanka.lk@gmail.com):
Yes Mr. Robert, I can understand. We can communicate through email.
robert flynn (.........@gmail.com):
Sounds good.
robert flynn (.........@gmail.com): Quantum Honeybees | Discover Magazine. I read this Suresh years ago. You and I seem to see in humans in the theory of everything like bees do in dancing. Take a look robert.
https://www.discovermagazine.com/planet-earth/quantum-honeybees
Suresh Wanayalae (smlanka.lk@gmail.com):
Some habits change genes etc. And that is why we should practice good habits (including mental habits) as much as possible to control our bad genetic (and Karmic) habits. Very few religions teach us about that kind of a practice.
robert flynn (.........@gmail.com):
So true!
I recall reading on how small rodents can change the expression of their genes such as fur colors in differing life environments.
So I guess it goes both ways.
Do you practice control on habits Suresh?
I think you do.
Your claim is "theory of everything "
in your book. What if the coding of genes was a theory of. (Like the bees) everything and we don't even know how much power we have..
I suspected that.. in 1990 I did 2 new patents. In nanotechnology. To make units or maybe signs of quark or gluons maybe in nano carbon tubes when shaped like infinite design because carbon is giving life and can change genes in our nerves.
The simple (laughing) codes you are developing may make sense because they (you claim,) are t.o.e.
How did you know. Ramanjuan also knew something , right, about math no one knew. I was somewhat friends at U of A. (Arizona) with Dr. Louis Mordell. Dr. Mordell was one of 3 who brought Ramanjuan to oxford univ in early days. Before my time, but he told me in 1964 at school. I was 16. Then he was70 .
They wanted to know how he knew.
About infinite. Secrets.
You mention that in your book.
Can you elaborate.
This way to communicate works.
Suresh Wanayalae (smlanka.lk@gmail.com):
Yes Mr. Robert, I try to control my habits in many ways. Usually most of us try to stay away from some influences to prevent continuing some bad habits. And sometimes if I had a bad thought on a habit then I try to replace the next thought with something opposite to it instantly. And sometimes I listen to good meditations (Eg: Mindfulness meditation with Loving-Kindness meditation) to make good thinking patterns when I don't have enough time to meditate. But if we work hard, then sometimes I think we have to compromise with some small bad habits (Eg: over eating, sleeping more than 8 hours per day, over talking or not talking with some people etc) for a short period of time to remove physical stress and influences quickly. And usually I try to use a lot of time to think and I try to follow at least the 5 precepts in Buddhism when I make habits.
If there is a part of our mind at least more than 0% or around 1% outside our genes and brain then maybe we all are connected with each other and maybe we can share our knowledge subconsciously too. And if it is possible then maybe we can develop a state of mind to understand a lot of things which others discovered, but according to Buddhism someone should practice a lot of habits for a long period of time to understand and experience the theory of everything.
I could read about Ramanjuan in wikipedia. And I could understand some important facts in his life which could lead him to think differently, and I guess he voluntarily wanted to do something better for society than worrying about himself (inherited bad health condition).
If there are hidden causes which we can discover on interactions of those causes, then we should try to find all the explanations about different types of possibilities to analyse and imagine those things with our common sense to select best possibilities. As an example, If there is something like a relatively stable distance for each universe (after every big bang), then maybe we will be able to remove some units (like time) from our constants to find a ratio with a distance to use it to measure other things to find the process of unknown things like gravity, dimensional interactions etc. I guess there is a constant like this 5.560725709696455x10^51m which is larger than the radius of the observable universe, and maybe that distance is larger than the radius of the current entire universe until the expansion of the entire universe exceeds that distance.! Maybe we will be able to find a neutral constant which we can use to connect ratios of the universe with the standard constants of the universe.!
And if we can understand how time works then maybe we will be able to understand how we can learn from both past and future too. Because if there is something which must happen in the future then maybe we can prepare to find it with notions of it, and then maybe that future itself can lead us to find it.!
- Suresh (09-03-2021)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Dr Brian Keating:
Thanks so much for watching!! What was your favorite takeaway from this conversation? Please join my mailing list to get FREE notes & resources from this show! Click 👉 http://briankeating.com/mailing_list.php
Suresh Wanayalae:
Matter in Buddhism: Pure Eight. 28 material phenomena. Life-time of a ‘Matter Area’ is equal to 17 ‘thought-moments’ , or 51 short instants; as there are 3 short instants in a moment of thought.
Suresh Wanayalae:
There are a lot of Arguments against God: 1.) Evolution created Adam and Eve. 2.) Big Bang is older than 10000 years, and earth. 3.) Creating & Killing Dinosours 4.) Mathematical Symmetries in the Universe 5.) Earthquakes & Cancers killing children 6.) The Earth is not flat. 7.) So-Called Messanger (prophet/mohommad) of God rejected the Son (jesus) of God & Jews (and sometimes act against entire humanity, including killing apostates). 8.) Some people still don't say that evolution created Adam and Eve, because maybe they try to hide or don't like to accept arguments against God.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The #1 Reason I Left Jehovah's Witnesses: Dinosaurs & Carnivores
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Read more (Next Page): The Theory Of Everything - Page 4 https://bauddha-tharka.blogspot.com/p/the-theory-of-everything-page-4.html
No comments:
Post a Comment