Buddhism helps us to experience the reality, without beliefs.

Buddhism helps us to experience the reality, without beliefs.
Buddhism helps us to experience the reality, without beliefs.

Creation of the Universe Explained by Suresh Madusanka


විශ්වයේ නිර්මාණයේ සත්‍ය - Creation Of The Universe Explained By Suresh Madusanka. (පහසුවෙන් තේරුම් ගැනීම සඳහා විනාඩි 25 ක කාලයක් ගෙන මෙම වීඩියෝව නරඹන්න.): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_PnmU_Dh6bo
_____________________________

Point 1: 
Stars and planets are products of Quantum Particles and Black Holes.

Point 2: 
As discovered, all the galaxies are accelerating away from the center after the big bang. It shows us that Universes may have properties of waves..

Point 3:
At the center of galaxies we can find a solid Black Hole. Which is an another form of emptiness.

My Logic:
Distance causes the universe to separate emptiness into two forms. It is the positive form of emptiness and the negative form of emptiness.

★ Space = distance + positive form of emptiness
★ Black Holes = distance + negative form of emptiness

★ Space + Black Holes = (distance + positive empty) + (distance + negative empty)

We can see it from this Buddhist Explanation too: "Form is emptiness, Emptiness is form."
It sounds like that there are two forms of emtinesses. (Positive Form Of Emptiness And Negative Form Of Emptiness)

When the emptiness acquire a distance it can create an Universe (or Multiverse).
★★★★★★★
Empty + Distance = (positive empty + distance) + (negative empty + distance) = Space + Black Holes = Universe 
★★★★★★★

W. Suresh Madusanka



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have a theory and a mathematical formula about the existence of the Universe.

Please try to read and understand my theory, and please let me know how I should proceed with it to publish my mathematical formula of the theory:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~





I'll try to explain briefly about the causes and effects. But those explanations are my own explanations, and it is a highly possible explanation, so you can't reject it if you can understand it.

What is the universe?

Imagine a place infinitely far away from our earth. Do you think that such place exist or not?

There can be three possibilities:

1. There are 'space'.

2. There are 'no space'.

3. There are both 'space' and 'no space'.

Eg:
★ "'Space' Universe": Imagine a universe with Space only.

★ "'No Space' Universe": Imagine a universe with No Space (Black Holes) only. Which is not empty, but filled with something solid.

★ "'Both Space and No Space' Universe": Our universe. Which has empty space and solid materials.

At the center of galaxies we can find a solid Black Hole. Which is an another form of emptiness.

What is 'space' and 'no space'?

Those are waves. 'space' is going to 'no space' therefor 'no space' behaves like a ware. Eg: light wave.

Those 'no space' waves join together and makes black holes (basic matter), which pulls the space and that is what which we call gravity, in which the 'no space' waves and those combined 'no spaces' (black holes) change it's speed, and create different forms of materials.

Black holes are pure 'no spaces' in the universe.

Some stars became black holes too. Till that became pure 'no spaces' they are mixed with 'space' and 'no space'

Gravity is: Space moving to No Space as an interaction of the universe. Space is trying to fill the No Space.

I just tried to explain it briefly. If you can understand it you can understand the existence of this universe, which has no start and no end. Some people don't want a creator to create the creator, but they want a creator to create the universe. No need to create this universe. Universe didn't start from the big bang. You have to define The Universe to understand the Universe. If you take universe as materials we see, then it is just a single universe, And we can say there are unlimited universes, which depends on waving between space and no space.

Cyclic wave like things usually accelerate. As discovered, universe is accelerating too, because universes are like waves. Universal time is changing on this process, so our current time will change few billion years later. Then it will reach the end of the wave cycle, and it will cause to make another big bang.

How materials created?

Materials are 'no spaces'. There is no space inside the quantum particles from which the materials created, so the space try to move into that no space, but never fill because both 'space' and 'no space' are just move from one place to another because both 'space' and 'no space' exists at the same time, because this universe is unlimited. The natural possibility of the existence and non existence (space and no space) combined together because 'only existence' or 'only non existence' is not possible to exist inside an unlimited universe, because there is no one (Almighty God) to create existence (space), so the universe need 'non existence' (no space) to manifest (to balance the zero and infinity).

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

My logical explanation about the existence of the Universe (or Multiverse):

Stars and planets are products of Quantum Particles and Black Holes.

★★★★★ Space + Black Holes - Distance = Empty ★★★★★

But if, the emptiness acquire a distance: Empty + Distance
Then, My Formula about the creation of the Universe (or Multiverse):

~~~ Empty + Distance = (positive empty + distance) + (negative empty + distance) = Space + Black Holes = Universe ~~~

★ Space + Black Holes - Distance = Empty

★ Space + Black Holes - Distance + Distance = Empty + Distance

★ Space + Black Holes = Empty + Distance

★ Empty + Distance = Space + Black Holes = Universe

★ Stars and Planets were created from Space and Black Holes.
★ Unlimited Distance + Unlimited Emptiness Created The Universe.

★★★★ Mathematical formula will be published later : ★★★★

Research by Suresh Madusanka

* I published this information to share my analysis about our existence. I guess you struggle to find about it too.

★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★

I can explain it.
Properties of the "Space" are:
1.) It has a distance
2.) It is the positive form of emptiness

Properties of the "Black Holes" are:
1.) It has a distance
2.) It is the negative form of emptiness

You can see the reactions of the positive emptiness and negative emptiness. That is Gravity.

This is the theory:

★ Space = distance + positive form of emptiness
★ Black Holes = distance + negative form of emptiness

★ Space + Black Holes = (distance + positive empty) + (distance + negative empty)

★ (Space + Black Holes) - Distance =
((distance + positive empty) + (distance + negative empty)) - Distance = positive empty + negative empty = Empty

Now we can understand this Formula:
★ Space + Black Holes - Distance = Empty

And we know that "Space" and Black Holes create Stars and Planets. So we can say:

★ Space + Black Holes = Universe

★ Space + Black Holes - Distance = Empty

From this we can understand that the Unlimited Distance and Unlimited Emptiness can create Space and Black Holes:
★ Empty + Distance = Space + Black Holes

So we can tell this for sure:
★ Empty + Distance = Space + Black Holes = Universe (or Multiverse)

(Result: "When the emptiness acquire a distance it can create an Universe (or Multiverse). Universe is expanding. So it can cause to change the amount of emptiness exist within the area belongs to our Universe, or within the edges of the other Universes. Maybe the Universe will try to be empty again. And then it can cause to make another big bang. As discovered, the amount of energy exist within our universe is changing on the pressure of the Dark Energy while the expansion. So we can understand that the interaction between the emptiness and distance can make energy during this process as well. So we can expect a creation of our Universe at an extreme of this process.")

★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★

Extra Note:
* Maybe the Emptiness and Distance behave like waves which can cause Big Bangs.
* Distance causes the universe to separate emptiness into two forms. It is the positive form of emptiness and the negative form of emptiness.
* Related Buddhist Explanation: Form is emptiness, Emptiness is form.

Thank you for reading my explanation about the existence of the Universe.

All the explanations written here is by:
W. Suresh Madusanka

Kind Regards,
Suresh

Phone (SMS Only): +94 78 51 54 798 (Text Only)
Address: 344, Ferguson Road,
Colombo 01500,
Sri Lanka.
Email: smlanka.lk@gmail.com




``````````````````````````````````````````````````````


Guys just wanted to share my theories! (Im a kid tho just dont hate ok?) What if i say god exist but he did not created us piece by piece he created the bigbang guys think about it if your a god why would you create the universe piece by piece if u can create something that would create that all. I mean the bigbang.

Suresh Wanayalae Read this carefully:

I'll show you what the facts are, and how the universe created.


Point 1: 
Stars and planets are products of Quantum Particles and Black Holes.

Point 2: 
As discovered, all the galaxies are accelerating away from the center after the big bang. It shows us that Universes may have properties of waves..

Point 3:
At the center of galaxies we can find a solid Black Hole. Which is an another form of emptiness.

My Logic:
Distance causes the universe to separate emptiness into two forms. It is the positive form of emptiness and the negative form of emptiness.

★ Space = distance + positive form of emptiness
★ Black Holes = distance + negative form of emptiness

★ Space + Black Holes = (distance + positive empty) + (distance + negative empty)

We can see it from this Buddhist Explanation too: "Form is emptiness, Emptiness is form."
It sounds like that there are two forms of emtinesses. (Positive Form Of Emptiness And Negative Form Of Emptiness)

When the emptiness acquire a distance it can create an Universe (or Multiverse).
★★★★★★★
Empty + Distance = (positive empty + distance) + (negative empty + distance) = Space + Black Holes = Universe 

I can explain how the universe created. I use science and logic to prove it. I call it cognitive science.

Cyclic wave like things usually accelerate. As discovered, universe is accelerating too, because universes are like waves. Universal time is changing on this process, so our current time will change few billion years later. Then it will reach the end of the wave cycle, and it will cause to make another big bang.

How materials created?

Materials are 'no spaces'. There is no space inside the quantum particles from which the materials created, so the space try to move into that no space, but never fill because both 'space' and 'no space' are just move from one place to another because both 'space' and 'no space' exists at the same time, because this universe is unlimited. The natural possibility of the existence and non existence (space and no space) combined together because 'only existence' or 'only non existence' is not possible to exist inside an unlimited universe, because there is no one (Almighty God) to create existence (space), so the universe need 'non existence' (no space) to manifest (to balance the zero and infinity).

Properties of the "Space" are:
1.) It has a distance
2.) It is the positive form of emptiness

Properties of the "Black Holes" are:
1.) It has a distance
2.) It is the negative form of emptiness

You can see the reactions of the positive emptiness and negative emptiness. That is Gravity.

This is the theory:

★ Space = distance + positive form of emptiness
★ Black Holes = distance + negative form of emptiness

★ Space + Black Holes = (distance + positive empty) + (distance + negative empty)

★ (Space + Black Holes) - Distance =
((distance + positive empty) + (distance + negative empty)) - Distance = positive empty + negative empty = Empty

Now we can understand this Formula:
★ Space + Black Holes - Distance = Empty

And we know that "Space" and Black Holes create Stars and Planets. So we can say:

★ Space + Black Holes = Universe

★ Space + Black Holes - Distance = Empty

From this we can understand that the Unlimited Distance and Unlimited Emptiness can create Space and Black Holes:
★ Empty + Distance = Space + Black Holes

So we can tell this for sure:
★ Empty + Distance = Space + Black Holes = Universe (or Multiverse)

(Result: "When the emptiness acquire a distance it can create an Universe (or Multiverse). Universe is expanding. So it can cause to change the amount of emptiness exist within the area belongs to our Universe, or within the edges of the other Universes. Maybe the Universe will try to be empty again. And then it can cause to make another big bang. As discovered, the amount of energy exist within our universe is changing on the pressure of the Dark Energy while the expansion. So we can understand that the interaction between the emptiness and distance can make energy during this process as well. So we can expect a creation of our Universe at an extreme of this process.")

★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★

Extra Note:
* Maybe the Emptiness and Distance behave like waves which can cause Big Bangs.
* Distance causes the universe to separate emptiness into two forms. It is the positive form of emptiness and the negative form of emptiness.
* Related Buddhist Explanation: Form is emptiness, Emptiness is form.

You can read more about it from here: https://bauddha-tharka.blogspot.com/p/i-have-theory-and-mathematical-formula.html...

If both of existence and non existence can interact with each other then no need a creator to create the existence.

These the the facts that impacted to the cause and effects of the universe:
1.) Unlimited Distance
2.) Emptiness

Distance seperated emptyness into two forms. Those are: 
1.) Positive Emptiness
Result: Positive Emptiness + Distance = Space
2.) Negotive Emptiness
Result: Positive Emptiness + Distance = Black Holes (Quantum Particles)

Imagine a place infinitly far away from our earth and all the galaxies. Do you think someone still create something there?

You can expect few types of universes there:

★ "'Space' Universe": Imagine a universe with Space only.

★ "'No Space' Universe": Imagine a universe with No Space (Black Holes) only. Which is not empty, but filled with something solid.

★ "'Both Space and No Space' Universe": Our universe. Which has empty space and solid materials (Black Hole, Stars, Planets and etc).

At the center of galaxies we can find a solid Black Hole. Which is an another (pure) form of emptiness.

Our known universe will be empty again after the expansion, and it will cease all the solid form of emptiness (quamtum particles) which can cause another big bang.

No need a creator to create the universe. But some people want a creator to create the universe, and that people don't want a creator to create the creator. That is not a problem with the existence of the universe, that is a problem with some people.

-----------------------------------------------------

Someone asked: Wait, how do black holes create stars and planets?

My Answer: Some massive Stars become a small back hole when they die, because it is the original form of materials.

You can learn how Black holes create stars from here: New Discovery: Supermassive Black Holes Create Galaxies : http://www.dailygalaxy.com/.../new-discovery-supermassive...




* Bauddha Tharka * ~~ Buddhism is the greatest religion in this world and in the universe. It explains about…
BAUDDHA-THARKA.BLOGSPOT.PE

ReplyRemove Preview
3
 20 hrs
Manage

Atish Ghosh Explained nicely, with light of Buddhist philosophy and your inferences.. you explained , Darkenergy and Dark matter as well. (Distance and no space) you only forgot to mention the hour glass contracture between Manifest and non Manifest , space- nospace junction.

Love
Reply
1
 1 hr
Remove
Suresh Wanayalae Atish Ghosh Yes, I can understand that. I just didn't want to make it more complex. I can explain it now. I guess that is the wave reaction of nospace (materials/photons/electrons etc.).
"double-slit experiment is a demonstration that light and matter can display characteristics of both classically defined waves and particles".

I think that the connection between Manifest and non Manifest (connection between 0 and 1)(or space- nospace junction) supported the space to be larger than nospace, but nospace created a net (wave) between space to balance it, I think that net is the wave reaction of particles. Not only the nospace (particles) try to eat space (gravity), but also it tries to separated the space and nospace junction. And when it separate the connection between Manifest and non Manifest duality (the moment where there is no "space" or "nospace" Space = Free form of Emptiness + Distance, And: Nospace = Solid form Emitiness + Distance), it makes two separate Space and Nospace for a moment, and then that Space join with Space which cause the space to be larger than nospace, but the Nospace (smallest quantum particle) appear and disappear instantly making a wave between space. And when it happens the main particle wave too, because the newly created nospace (string) shake the space and shake the particle too. Those newly created nospaces (quantum particles (strings) around the main particle) disappear instantly. But we can see it from the "double-slit experiment".

Double-slit experiment: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DfPeprQ7oGc




Dr Quantum - Double Slit…
YOUTUBE.COM

ReplyRemove Preview4 mins

Atish Ghosh Point to ponder smallest of small AND biggest of big.. earlier things were just limited to Schrödinger's cat.. Thanx for reply.

LikeShow more reactions
Reply1 min

Suresh Wanayalae That duality of Existence (Space) and Non-existence (Nospace) which exists as a couple, can be the dark energy which exists outside our observable Universe which caused to accelerate the expansion.

LikeShow more reactions
ReplyJust now


---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Suraj Gautam Nice explanation but you commented this to here

LikeShow more reactions
Reply7 hrsEdited
Remove

LikeShow more reactions
Reply6 hrs
Martin Cooper Wait, how do black holes create stars and planets?

Reply36 mins
Remove

Suresh Wanayalae Martin Cooper Some massive Stars become a small back hole when they die, because it is the original form of materials.

You can learn how Black holes create stars from here: New Discovery: Supermassive Black Holes Create Galaxies : http://www.dailygalaxy.com/.../new-discovery-supermassive...




The answer may have been found to the…
DAILYGALAXY.COM





Suresh Wanayalae Two things created the Universe. 1.) Emptiness 2.) Distance 

The problem is some people don't want a creator to create the creator. They have given a bulshit definiition to the creator to create itself.

I have explained how universe created.science and logic with clear facts. Read this carefully to understand it: https://bauddha-tharka.blogspot.com/p/i-have-theory-and-mathematical-formula.html

Jaswinder Singh Chaggar Suresh Wanayalae, and memory, how is that configured in this? .. .. .. 



Suresh Wanayalae Jaswinder Singh Chaggar If you try to understand the properties of Space and Black Holes (quantum particles) then you can understand that both are like two sides of the same coin. When there is a front side, then it should have a back side. When the emptiness created the Space, it created the Black Hole (quantum particles) too. So the Space must try to fill the Black Hole (Nospace) to finish the existence of the Space. Space try fill Black Holes (Gravity) but this unlimited Distance (Universe) don't let it do that. But the Distance and Emptiness cause the Universe to behave like a wave and sometime the Distance blow up the Space (Positive Emptiness + Distance) and create Nospace (Negotive Emptiness + Distance) at the start (big bang create new aeon) of the wave that ends again after expansion of the Universe.

Reply
1
 3 hrs
Jaswinder Singh Chaggar Suresh Wanayalae 1. What was there before anything. 2. How/when does memory come to exist. Keep it as simple as possible, for the non scholarly types. TYVMIA.

Reply2 hrs
Suresh Wanayalae Jaswinder Singh Chaggar There is no such thing as start for the existence, non-existence and the existence with non-existence. But I think the so called dark energy is the easily explainable answer to your question. From the facts I analysed, the dark energy should be the instant of existence with non-existence. As discovered, most of the dark energy exist outside our observable Universe. So we have to go to outside of our observable Universe to explain about it, because within our observable Universe the existence and non-existence has separated after the big bang. That separation happened because there are too much (unlimited) distance to give to both existence and non-existence, So both can use two different distance to exist within our observable Universe. But still there are unseparated existence with non-existence instant which use same distance one after another. Because both instantly exist and disappear within the same distance they don't make a existence or a non-existence permanently, but it (dark energy) separate with the expansion of our observable Universe. That is how the Universe create new energy. (Anti-gravity and the True Nature of Dark Energy https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UwYSWAlAewc which create energy). Our Universe will be empty after the expansion, and the cessation of all the particles (black holes, stars etc). Big bang is the time when the center of our Universe is over stretched because there are no non-existence inside it to balance it. And that is the time which the Universe create (blow up the space / big explosion again at the center) a bigger non-existence instantly to balance the existence with the distance, and that is the big bang. That process is repeating without a start, because there were always three main things inside the Universe. Those are existence (space+distance), non-existence (nospace+distance) and existence with non-existence instant, where the space and nospace use the same distance instantly by making space instantly and then making nospace (quantum bang) instantly by eating each other. And that is the birth place of the existence and non-existence (dark energy), but the unilimited distance can cause to seperate that combination.



What about dark energy allows it…
YOUTUBE.COM

ReplyRemove Preview37 mins
Suresh Wanayalae Jaswinder Singh Chaggar I have an answer for your second question too. I'll try to explain it briefly.
We can understand that the space and particles can store a lots of data within this Universe. So the only thing we have to find is how a mind (the writer) created.
My simple answer is 'illusion'. But it has a big meaning. Illusion can start after a combination of atomic particles and quantum particles, or after a combination like that. If there were only atomic particles, then the mind will not continue, but because there are quantum particles a mind can continue. But the first thing is the process of the mind which started on a cyclic process of the nature. As we know there are cyclic processes like rain cycle and etc. So if a atomic particles make a cyclic process and then if it continued from quantum particles to until it find atomic particles again, then we can call it a mind.
I think, that explanation is enough for now.

Suresh Wanayalae Jaswinder Singh Chaggar If you can't understand this, it is not a my problem, it is a your problem. I know most people can't understand it from written words only. 
Try to understand This: 
"That process is repeating without a start, because there were
 always three main things inside the Universe. Those are existence (space+distance), non-existence (nospace+distance) and existence with non-existence instant, where the space and nospace use the same distance instantly by making space instantly and then making nospace (quantum bang) instantly by eating each other. And that is the place birth place of the existence and non-existence (dark energy), but the unilimited distance can cause to seperate that combination."


Reply2 hrs
Manage
Suresh Wanayalae Jaswinder Singh Chaggar Existence with non-existence instant = "Where the space and nospace use the same distance instantly by making space instantly and then making nospace (quantum bang) instantly by eating each other. And that is the place birth place of the existence and non-existence (dark energy), but the unilimited distance can cause to seperate that combination."

Reply2 hrs
Manage
Jaswinder Singh Chaggar Suresh Wanayalae "That process is repeating without a start, because there were always three main things inside the Universe". No start ever? how so? Bigbang theory debunked in that one sentence! TYVM

Reply2 hrs
Remove
Suresh Wanayalae 1.) Existence = Imagine ball. 
2.) Non-Existence= Imagine a ball size of space (without the ball ). 
3.) Existence with Non-Existence = Imagine a ball appear and disappear. It meens, the ball and space use the same place.


Those three things with distance created the Universe. Those three things don't need a start. Big bang is not the start. Big bang is the time when the ball appear before it disappear again.


Reply
1
1 hr
Manage
Jaswinder Singh Chaggar Ok good, 1 item 1st, which one?

Reply
1
1 hr
Remove
Suresh Wanayalae Jaswinder Singh Chaggar 1.) Existence with Non-Existence > This can be the first 1. Because "best current measurements indicate that dark energy contributes 68.3% of the total energy in the present-day observable universe" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy

But the distance has a potential to seperated it without a start because not only Existence with Non-Existence is a part of the Universe, but also Distance is also a part of the universe naturally.
So we can expect a wave of those three things without a start. 
That waves make them be larger and smaller from time to time.

2.) Existence = Imagine a ball. 
3.) Non-Existence= Imagine a ball size of space (without the ball ).


In physical cosmology and astronomy, dark energy is an unknown form of energy which is…
EN.WIKIPEDIA.ORG

ReplyRemove Preview
1
1 hr
Manage
Jaswinder Singh Chaggar There was no dark matter in the 'nothing ball', came much much much much later. 1 Small Step at aTime please, very slow 3 cell brain here, very old too.

Reply
1
1 hr
Remove
Suresh Wanayalae Jaswinder Singh Chaggar dark matter try to reduce the expansion of the Universe, but there are not enough dark inside our Universe to stop the expansion. However, that dark matter can be the normal form of non-existence. And the Black holes can be the pressured form of non-existence.

Reply
1
1 hr
Manage
Jaswinder Singh Chaggar Nope no Dark Matter, try again, think simple steps, very very simple pls. You arr very close to solving this particular puzzle.

Reply
1
1 hr
Remove
Suresh Wanayalae Jaswinder Singh Chaggar Dark Matter don't react with particles, and we can't see it too. But we can detect it from the gravity of it. I think the Dark Matter is a separated form of non-existence (nospace) which are not tightly combined with each other to make a particle, because still the space not stretched enough to increase the gravity of the Universe. 
The simple answer is "both dark matter (non-existence) and space (existence) combination was also separated before the big bang to create non-existence inside the previous observable universe, because that Universe became empty and there were only space there after the expansion. So, as a side effect the space stretched enough to bring non-existence (nospace) again at the center to balance the existence and non-existence within the expanded Universe. It made 26.8% dark matter (slightly separated non-existence/nospace) inside the old Universe, before it make a new Universe with 4.9% ordinary matter (completely separated and joined non-existence/nospace) with the big bang. 
I think that explanation about the Dark Matter is enough for now.

My most favourite actor is SRK.  But I can't give the second place to Amitabh Bachchan and Hrithik Roshan.

LikeShow more reactions
Comment
Comments

LikeShow more reactions
Reply1 hr
Manage
Suresh Wanayalae for me it is like three generations. 1.Amitabh 2.) Sharukh 3.) Hrithik 
all are first.


LikeShow more reactions
Reply
1
1 hr
Manage
Jaswinder Singh Chaggar Ok, got it. How old r u ?

LikeShow more reactions
Reply1 hr
Manage

LikeShow more reactions
Reply
1
1 hr
Manage
Jaswinder Singh Chaggar So young, so very intelligent, spiritual too, are you the next Messiah ?

LoveShow more reactions
Reply
1
1 hr
Manage
Suresh Wanayalae Jaswinder Singh Chaggar I wanted to be a Buddha after many aeons. But I gave up that idea, because it is very difficult to live this life too. I don't know about my intelligence. I just take time study first to think about them to find answers. I hope to do some meditations to know more about me, and to know my purpose of samsaric life. But still I don't have a good background to do it.

LikeShow more reactions
Reply1 hr
Manage
Jaswinder Singh Chaggar One. (KISS) Keep it Simple and Short.

LoveShow more reactions
Reply
1
1 hr
Manage
Jaswinder Singh Chaggar Two. Never give up Noble Spirituality, ask ye will receive. The Giver never tires, the recipient eventually will. Buddha meditated years away sitting under a Pipal Tree, as you well know, then one fine day he too was shown all creation, and the how. So keep at it, Meditate, or learn to too.

Love
Reply
2
1 hr
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Drakar Mgner Mathematical probability supports a creator and that's hard fact. Which you would know if you did actual research. We can detect the size of the universe from cosmic background radiation and Big bang calcs support the existence of a creator. Ignorance is bliss, but ignorance isn't an excuse for stupidity.

Reply7 hrs
Remove
Suresh Wanayalae Drakar Mgner probability isn't a fact. it just caused to support life in this universe, but there can be time when there are universes which don't support life, but it doesn't explain a existense of a creator. According to Buddhism there were 70 aeons (70 big bangs) when there were no Buddhas. and again there were around 30 aeons (30 big bangs) when there were no Buddhas. Usually a Buddha appear when there are living beings, but we can understand that there are written evidencde in Buddhism that clearly stated that there were Universes where Buddha don't appear, that meens Buddhism talk about probability too. And it is scientifical. You can't show a God, you can just show the existence of living beings to prove the existence of a God, But it is totally stupid.

Reply6 hrsEdited
Manage
Aidan Yeomans Drakar Mgner there is not a single “hard fact” to support a creator

Reply
1
5 hrs
Remove
Aloysius Samuel Bible and Qoran is for kids.

Like
Reply
2
4 hrs
Remove
Suresh Wanayalae I like to complete this conversation with another important fact about the probability of the existence of the universe with life. 
That probability totally agree with my theories (explanations) about the existence of the universe, and it explains why it supported living being without making it a unique probability. I'll try to explain it briefly.

Our observable universe have 68.3% dark energy, 26.8% dark matter and 4.9% ordinary matter. Scientists think the balance between the dark energy and dark matter is a unique combination, but is not the case according to my theory. Actually the three things which created the universe were already balanced. The three things are 
1.) Existence (space) = Imagine a ball. 
2.) Non-Existence (dark matter and ordinary matter) = Imagine a ball size of space (without the ball ). 
3.) Existence with Non-Existence (dark energy) = Imagine a ball appear and disappear. It means, the ball and space use the same place.
Those three things were already interconnected, so a balanced combination can happen within a small range of probabilities, because those 3 things should be balanced within maximum 33.33% range of probabilities, but because those three things can move from one place to another on the unlimited distance of the universe those three things can always maintain the percentage from a cyclic process of regeneration. So, as an example if we give a fixed 33.33 percentage for each of them. then we can count the probability range like this: 
Probability Range = 100% - (33.33% x 3) = 100% - 99.99% = 0.01%
From that example we can say there can be only 0.01% range of those three things which might break the law of the balance of them with the support of unlimited distance of the universe, or if the fixed rate is 33.3333 then only 0.0001% range which break the balance of the three things, or if the fixed rate is this 33.333333333333% then only 0.000000000001% range might break the balance of those three things and make waves making big bangs within a very small range of probabilities.
I hope this explanation is enough for now.
Suresh Wanayalae Maybe we will be able to measure that small range of probabilities from the amount of ordinary matter (from the gravity of ordinary matter).

LikeShow more reactions
ReplyJust now


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Owen Lloyd You've missed the point, your ideas are wrong.
Manage


Reply1h
Suresh Wanayalae Owen Lloyd I'll not explain more: 

I havn't missed any point, but you have. 

If you can't understand this explanation, Please learn more about causes and effects first. I used causes and effects only. So there is nothing you can remove or reject.

Please read this carefully and try to understand it first, I'll not explain same thing agaiin.:

Imagine that emptiness first. Then you will see nothing. Keep in your mind that it doesn't have a distance too. But if you put distance to that emptiness, then what will happen?

You have to know what a distance first. Distance is a Gap without any object or space in between.

So how the emptiness and distance will react with each other?

Distance can't appear without an object or space in between. So the Distance shoud break the emptiness (0) to make space make a distance. That break made two forms of emptinesses. those are +1 emptiness and -1 emptiness, because when it create Space (+1) it created Nospace (-1) to balance it. 

Space is a fact. (Positive Emptiness + Distace)

Nospace is a fact. Those are Dark Matter and Ordinary Matter. (Negotive Emptiness + Distace)
Manage


Reply1h
Owen Lloyd Demonstrate an example of emptiness then, not quote what you think it is, but a real example.
Manage


Reply1h
Suresh Wanayalae Owen Lloyd I told you that Emptiness is equal to 0 which can't demonstrate from anything, because it is nothing. And that 0 emptiness only a middle point of the + emptiness and - emptiness , so it is not a stable position, and it is only a moment of that wave which created by distance. But we can demostrate the Positive Empiness + Distance or Negotive Emptiness + Distance.

Space = Positive Empiness + Distance 
Nospace (Black Holes/Quantum particles/dark matter) = Negotive Emptiness + Distance 
Space + Nospace is dark energy.

If I go in front of a mirror and try to hide my image (reflection) from the mirror, can't do it, because the mirror made it using my body, but if I don't have a body then I would not see me in the mirror. So if I don't have a body then we can call it an Emptiness of me. And if my body appear again then we can call it Positive Emptiness of me but we know that we can't stop the reflection from the mirror, and we can call it the Negotive Emptiness of me, and we can say me or the mirror made the reflections. Me is the Emptiness. Mirror is the Distance which created a posibility to view something.

Just try to understand it with the existence of dark energy, dark matter, black holeks,, space and etc. I don't think I need more proofs. Dark energy, Dark matter and Black Holes are great demonstrations too. Specially Dark Energy and Dark Matter confirmed my explanations. I don't see any other reason to exist something like Dark Energy and Dark Matter.
Manage


Reply25mEdited
Owen Lloyd So no then, you can't give an example & yes, you do need more proof because a) you have none & b) you haven't provided anything other than your own assertions.

If you think you have something, run it past a well known scientist, or write a paper & hav
e it peer reviewed & published, but I'm guessing that you won't be taken seriously & I doubt that the most public it will be is you promoting your website. I wouldn't hold your breath for the Nobel Prize.

To be frank, I've gotten bored of this because you can't provide the necessary evidence & you are deliberately missing the point continually, Toodles.
Manage


Reply20m
Suresh Wanayalae Owen Lloyd If you think your God created Dark energy and Dark matter to help you live, then it's fine. But I explained how it can exists without a God. That is enough for now. As I told you before I showed the facts only. But you don't want to see it and asking the same questions again. If I tell you a God created it, I don't think you will ask more questions.. Ha ha
Manage


Reply10mEdited
Suresh Wanayalae Owen Lloyd However I have a proof, but I'll not take time to explain it again, because I already it to someone else. I'll just copy and paste it to here.

Wave reaction of nospace (materials/photons/electrons etc.)"

"double-slit experiment is a demonstration that light and matter can display characteristics of both classically defined waves and particles".

I think that the connection between Manifest and non Manifest (connection between 0 and 1)(or space- nospace junction) supported the space to be larger than nospace, but nospace created a net (wave) between space to balance it, I think that net is the wave reaction of particles. Not only the nospace (particles) try to eat space (gravity), but also it tries to separated the space and nospace junction. And when it separate the connection between Manifest and non Manifest duality (the moment where there is no "space" or "nospace" Space = Free form of Emptiness + Distance, And: Nospace = Solid form Emitiness + Distance), it makes two separate Space and Nospace for a moment, and then that Space join with Space which cause the space to be larger than nospace, but the Nospace (smallest quantum particle) appear and disappear instantly making a wave between space. And when it happens the main particle wave too, because the newly created nospace (string) shake the space and shake the particle too. Those newly created nospaces (quantum particles (strings) around the main particle) disappear instantly. But we can see it from the "double-slit experiment".

Double-slit experiment: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DfPeprQ7oGc

That duality of Existence (Space) and Non-existence (Nospace) which exists as a couple, can be the dark energy which exists outside our observable Universe which caused to accelerate the expansion.
Manage



Dr Quantum - Double Slit Experiment This…
YOUTUBE.COM

ReplyRemove Preview3mEdited


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Peter Lipscomb But it's not a "theory"...more of a hypothesis, yes? So, my first question would be: why would I take an opinion on the formation of the Cosmos from someone who misunderstandings what a theory is?
Manage


Reply5h
Suresh Wanayalae Peter Lipscomb If Gravity is a thoery, and evolution is a theory, then you can call my explanation is a theory too, because it is based on facts.
Manage


Reply5hEdited
Peter Lipscomb Nope you can't...well, you CAN...you can call it a cheese sandwich if you want...calling it a theory doesn't make it one. Gravity and evolution are both backed by, literally, thousands of peer reviewed papers...yours..not one would be accurate?
Manage


Reply1h
Suresh Wanayalae Peter Lipscomb This is a proof of my theory: The Quantum Experiment that Broke Reality https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-MNSLsjjdo
But scientists still can't explain it.
So if the scientists find a way to explain it. Then they will see that my theory is correct.
Manage

ReplyRemove Preview44m
Peter Lipscomb And publish your findings in a PEER reviewed journal... that's how science works...and YouTube? Oh, good god!
Manage


Reply42m
Suresh Wanayalae Peter Lipscomb Yes, I didn't have time to publish it yet. But I just tried to get reviews from internet first. However, I hope to visit a relevant research center to get advice to publish it and send it to the Nasa. I know the process, but I can't do it alone. I'll try to do it soon. thank you for your advice.
Manage


Reply26m
Peter Lipscomb Good..great...good luck! You might want to think about: what would falsify my hypothesis? And again..good luck!
Manage


Reply22m
Suresh Wanayalae Peter Lipscomb Thank you. I can understand it. Bad reviews helped me a lot. good luck to you too.
Manage


Reply

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



No need a creator to create the universe. But some people want a creator to create the universe, and that people don't want a creator to create the creator. That is not a problem with the existence of the universe, that is a problem with some people.

The problem is some people don't want a creator to create the creator. They have given a bullshit definition to the creator to create itself.

If both of existence and non existence can interact with each other then no need a creator to create the existence.

Our observable universe have 68.3% dark energy, 26.8% dark matter and 4.9% ordinary matter.

1.) Existence (space) = Imagine a ball. 
2.) Non-Existence (dark matter and ordinary matter) = Imagine a ball size of space (without the ball ). 
3.) Existence with Non-Existence (dark energy) = Imagine a ball appear and disappear. It means, the ball and space use the same place.

Existence with Non-Existence + Existence + Non-Existence = Universe

Still there are unseparated "existence with non-existence".  But it (dark energy) separate with the expansion of our observable Universe. And that is how the Universe create new energy. 
(Anti-gravity and the True Nature of Dark Energy https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UwYSWAlAewc which create energy) 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Suresh Wanayalae Why people need a creator? Why they don't understand this simple rule of existence:

Our observable universe have 68.3% dark energy, 26.8% dark matter and 4.9% ordinary matter.


Three things created the Universe:

1.) Existence with Non-Existence (dark energy/68.3%) = Imagine a ball appear and disappear. It means, the ball and space use the same place.
2.) Existence (space) = Imagine a ball. 
3.) Non-Existence (dark matter and ordinary matter 26.8%+4.9%) = Imagine a ball size of space (without the ball ).

Existence with Non-Existence (dark energy) = 68.3% 

Non-Existence (dark matter and ordinary matter) 26.8%+4.9% = 31.7%

Existence (space) = X

Now Find the X.

-------------------------------------
Answer:

Existence with Non-Existence (dark energy) = 68.3% 

Don't you see that Dark Energy is two times larger than Dark Matter + Ordinary Matter?

Non-Existence (dark matter and ordinary matter) 26.8%+4.9% = 31.7%

But why?

Answer:
Existence took the other 50% from it.

Eg: Existence (space) = 68.3% - 31.7% = 36.6%

https://bauddha-tharka.blogspot.com/.../existence-of...
Manage

LikeShow more reactions
ReplyRemove Preview17h
Francisco Helio Gomez Palma So, if you put all those things together then there is a creator?
Manage


LikeShow more reactions
Reply13h
Suresh Wanayalae Francisco Helio Gomez Palma No creator. Everything is natural. 
Those three things no need a creator. And those things forever exists everywhere.


1.) Existence with Non-Existence (dark energy/68.3%) = Imagine a ball appear and disappear. It means, the ball and space use the same place.
2.) Existence (space) = Imagine a ball. 
3.) Non-Existence (dark matter and ordinary matter 26.8%+4.9%) = Imagine a ball size of space (without the ball ).
Manage


LikeShow more reactions
Reply2h
Francisco Helio Gomez Palma Suresh Wanayalae that is what is... and whatever created that is the creator... call it energy, call it contrast... it does not matter since something created it... now tell me what created everything you speak of!
Manage


LikeShow more reactions
Reply2h
Suresh Wanayalae Francisco Helio Gomez Palma You didn't get the point yet. 
You can't call it a creation. You have to call it existence with non-existence. That is the point. existence or non-existence is not a creation. You can learn more about it from here: 
https://bauddha-tharka.blogspot.com/.../existence-of...

There were not a beginning to create anything. There were always existence and non-existence. If you can't understand it I don't want to argue with you.
Manage

LikeShow more reactions
ReplyRemove Preview57m

Suresh Wanayalae It is only a cyclic proccess. It doesn't have a beginning or a creation. And still happens.
This is a proof of my theory: The Quantum Experiment that Broke Reality https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-MNSLsjjdo
But scientists still can't explain it.
...See More
Manage
The double slit experiment radically changed…
YOUTUBE.COM
LikeShow more reactions
ReplyRemove Preview24m

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rammo Vo There is no proof yet to evolution, evolution is theory it is not fact.

LikeShow more reactions
Reply34 mins
Remove
Suresh Wanayalae Genetic Facts: Proof of Evolution: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qh7OclPDN_s



Evolution: Genetic Evidence -…
YOUTUBE.COM

LikeShow more reactions
ReplyRemove Preview32 mins
Manage
Suresh Wanayalae Rammo Vo 1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chromosome_2_(human) 2. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chimpanzee_genome_project 3. Ken Miller Human Chromosome 2 Genome https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8FGYzZOZxMw



Chromosome 2 is one of the 23 pairs of chromosomes in humans. People normally…
EN.WIKIPEDIA.ORG

LikeShow more reactions
ReplyRemove Preview29 mins
Manage
Suresh Wanayalae Rammo Vo All members of Hominidae except humans, Neanderthals, and Denisovans have 24 pairs of chromosomes.[7] Humans have only 23 pairs of chromosomes. Human chromosome 2 is a result of an end-to-end fusion of two ancestral chromosomes.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chromosome_2_(human)




Chromosome 2 is one of the 23 pairs of chromosomes in humans. People normally…
EN.WIKIPEDIA.ORG

LikeShow more reactions
ReplyRemove Preview28 mins

1 comment:

  1. It is usual to Start at the Beginning, or at least postulate one.

    ReplyDelete